Correspondence may also be addressed to Steven Chu. Tel: +1 650 723 3571; Fax: +1 650 723 9173; Email:
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use permissions, please contact
Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy can reveal mechanistic and kinetic details that may not be observed in static structural and bulk biochemical studies of protein synthesis. One approach requires site-specific and stable attachment of fluorophores to the components of translation machinery. Fluorescent tagging of the ribosome is a prerequisite for the observation of dynamic changes in ribosomal conformation during translation using fluorescence methods. Modifications of the ribosomal particle are difficult due to its complexity and high degree of sequence and structural conservation. We have developed a general method to label specifically the prokaryotic ribosome by hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotides to mutated ribosomal RNA. Functional, modified ribosomes can be purified as a homogenous population, and fluorescence can be monitored from labeled ribosomal complexes immobilized on a derivatized quartz surface.
Translation of genetic information into polypeptide by the ribosome is a fundamental and universal cellular process. The ribosome is a highly conserved and complex macromolecular assembly that has been extensively studied by bulk biochemical and structural techniques. Aided by protein elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G), the ribosome reads trinucleotide codons on the mRNA and selects tRNAs carrying specific amino acids to synthesize the encoded polypeptide (
Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy allows analysis of complex multistep and repetitive biological processes that are impossible to synchronize at the molecular level (
Several approaches have been explored previously to label the ribosome for biochemical and structural studies. Covalent attachment of chelated Fe2+ to unique cysteine residues of an isolated ribosomal protein was used to monitor local ribosome structure through the generation of hydroxyl radicals (
Here, we present an efficient and flexible approach to label ribosomes for fluorescence studies by hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotides to helical extensions engineered in the rRNA. Unlike ribosome reconstitution from isolated components, our approach allows the preparation of homogenous populations of modified ribosomal particles that retain functionality
Mutations were introduced in selected helices of the
Ribosomes were purified from TA531 cells expressing wild-type or mutant pKK3535 following published protocols with slight modifications (
Initiation factors IF-1, IF-2 and IF-3 were purified from overexpressing
Binding assays were carried out with 10 nM 32P-labeled oligonucleotides and 100 nM purified ribosomes preheated at 42°C and incubated for 2 h at 37°C (unless indicated otherwise) in Tris-polymix buffer (
Translation assays were carried out according to the published protocols (
Purified ribosomes prehybridized with excess Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide were assembled onto 5′-biotinylated synthetic mRNA in the presence of fMet-tRNAfMet and initiation factors in Tris-polymix buffer following published protocols with slight modifications (
The ribosome is a multicomponent assembly of rRNA and proteins, both of which are potential targets for attachment of fluorescent dyes. To ensure homogeneity and functionality of our ribosomal particles, we devised a method that involves the expression of pure mutant ribosomes that can be labeled by hybridization of fluorescent oligonucleotides to extensions in rRNA hairpins. The oligonucleotide hybridization approach also ensures maximum labeling specificity and stability, while allowing a wide distribution range of target sites throughout the ribosome structure.
Sites for oligonucleotide hybridization were introduced into phylogenetically variable regions of the
Mutant ribosomes expressed from plasmid pKK3535 containing hairpin 1 extensions in helices 10, 33a, 39 and 44 were isolated as pure populations from the TA531 strain; wild-type ribosomes were also expressed and isolated from this plasmid system. To test for binding of the oligonucleotide to the designed ribosomal extension and to optimize annealing conditions, we performed hybridization with 32P-labeled DNA oligonucleotides targeting various portions of hairpin 1 extension (
To improve binding affinity, a series of target hairpins were designed, in which more mismatches were introduced into the hairpin stem (selected constructs, hairpin 2 through 5, are shown in
The functionality of purified mutant ribosomes containing hairpin 5 extension in helix 33a prehybridized with the sp5 oligonucleotide was demonstrated using
To examine the applicability of the oligonucleotide hybridization method for tagging ribosomal particles for use in single-molecule fluorescence experiments, mutant ribosomes with the hairpin 5 extension in helix 33a were hybridized with the Cy3-labeled sp5 oligonucleotide. Labeled ribosomes were then assembled into initiation complexes with 5′-biotinylated or non-biotinylated mRNA and initiator tRNA, and immobilized on streptavidin-derivatized quartz surfaces, as described previously (
To observe dynamic distance changes using FRET, two fluorophores must be introduced on the particle of interest. Excitation of the donor fluorophore (Cy3 in this study) with laser light will result in non-radioactive transfer of energy and fluorescence emission from the acceptor fluorophore (Cy5 in this study) if the two dyes are within certain distance determined by their spectral properties (
Fluorescent labeling of surface-immobilized ribosomes had no effect on their function. The efficiency of tRNA binding was 50% as visualized by FRET in 143 out of 287 ribosome complexes observed in four separate experiments. The rate of tRNA delivery was monitored as the increase in the number of ribosomes with FRET ≥ 0.10 over time (
The high degree of conservation and complexity of the ribosome does not make it very amenable to genetic or chemical modification. Our approach to hybridize fluorescent oligonucleotides to target sites engineered into the 16S rRNA allows stable and specific labeling of the prokaryotic ribosome for single-molecule fluorescence studies. To ensure that fluorescence labeling does not disrupt biological function, the activity of engineered ribosomal particles was tested both genetically and biochemically. Plasmids encoding the
Ribosomes labeled with fluorescent oligonucleotides were used in single-molecule fluorescence experiments. Cy3-labeled ribosomes assembled efficiently into initiation complexes and were immobilized onto derivatized quartz surfaces through an mRNA–biotin–streptavidin linkage. Fluorescence corresponding to single Cy3 dyes was observed over long time periods, indicating stable association of the dye-labeled DNA with the ribosomal particle. This is consistent with the slow dissociation rates of nucleic acid helices. Binding of fluorescently labeled tRNA to surface-immobilized labeled ribosomes was observed using single-molecule FRET. The efficiency and rates of aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the labeled ribosomes were comparable with that of unlabeled ribosomes, as previously measured. The fidelity of mutant ribosomes was also determined by testing their selectivity in binding cognate tRNA species on the surface (M. Dorywalska and J. D. Puglisi, unpublished data).
The advantages of our approach include high degree of labeling specificity and efficiency, versatility in the selection of tagging sites and ability to assemble functional particles
Insertions of short sequences into rRNA have been previously used as means for determining the location of the extended helices on the
M.D. is supported by the Howard Hughes Predoctoral Fellowship and Stanford Graduate Fellowship, S.C.B. was supported by the Giannini Family Foundation and R.L.G. is supported by the American Cancer Society. Funded by NIH grant GM51266 (J.D.P.), grants from NSF and NASA (S.C.) and Packard Foundation grant 2000-01671 (J.D.P. and S.C.). The authors thank Dr Claudio Gualerzi for initiation factor overexpression strains, Dr Cathy Squires for the TA531 strain, Dr Tae-Hee Lee for help with FRET data analysis, Eric Lau for the preparation of initiation factors, and Drs Eric Jan and Brian Gibbons for comments on the manuscript. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by NIH grant GM51266.
The atomic resolution model of
Hairpin extensions introduced into
Gel shift assays showing the binding of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides to 70S ribosomes isolated from various mutant strains. Oligonucleotides were hybridized to ribosomes preheated at 42°C and slowly cooled to 37°C for 2 h. Free oligonucleotide runs at the bottom of the gel. Oligonucleotide bound to mutant ribosomes forms a slower migrating complex on top of the gel. The two bands observed on top of some lanes are due to the oligonucleotide interaction with both intact 70S ribosomes and 30S subunits resulting from partial 70S dissociation in this low Mg2+ gel system. (
Translational activity assays. (
Single-molecule fluorescence observation of surface-immobilized, fluorescently labeled ribosomes. (
Oligonucleotides used for 16S rRNA mutagenesis
| Name | Sequence | Clone |
|---|---|---|
| 16S.A-1a | AAAAAGCGAAGCGGCACTG | External primer |
| 16S.A-1d | AATCCTGTTTGCTCCCCACG | External primer |
| 16S.G-1a | GTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGAG | External primer |
| 16S.G-1d | TCACAAACCAGCAAGTGGCG | External primer |
| 16S.A-1b | GAAG |
helix 6 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.A-1c | GAAG |
helix 6 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.B-1b | TCC |
helix 33a hairpin 1 |
| 16S.B-1c | GCC |
helix 33a hairpin 1 |
| 16S.B-2b | TCC |
helix 33a hairpin 2 |
| 16S.B-2c | GCC |
helix 33a hairpin 2 |
| 16S.B-3b | TCC |
helix 33a hairpin 3 |
| 16S.B-3c | GCC |
helix 33a hairpin 3 |
| 16S.B-4b | TCC |
helix 33a hairpin 4 |
| 16S.B-4c | GCC |
helix 33a hairpin 4 |
| 16S.B-5b | TCC |
helix 33a hairpin 5 |
| 16S.B-5c | GCC |
helix 33a hairpin 5 |
| 16S.C-1b | TCC |
helix 44 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.C-1c | ACC |
helix 44 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.D-1b | CGG |
helix 39 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.D-1c | CGG |
helix 39 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.E-1b | GCAAAG |
helix 17 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.E-1c | GTAAAG |
helix 17 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.F-1b | GGCC |
helix 10 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.F-1c | GACC |
helix 10 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.G-1b | CGCC |
helix 26 hairpin 1 |
| 16S.G-1c | TGC |
helix 26 hairpin 1 |
Primers with names ending in ‘a’ and ‘b’ were used to amplify the upstream portion of the gene, while primers ‘c’ and ‘d’ were used to amplify the downstream portion. The resultant PCR products with extensions (shown in bold) were then used to amplify the entire mutant fragment.
Selected oligonucleotides used for hybridization to the 16S rRNA insertions
| Name | Sequence | Target insertion |
|---|---|---|
| sp1 | AGGCGACAGGAGTGGCGA | hairpin 1 |
| sp1′ | AGGCGACAGGAGTG | hairpin 1 |
| sp3 | GAGCGACAGGACTG | hairpin 3 |
| sp4 | GAGCGATCAGGAGT | hairpin 4 |
| sp5 | GGGAGATCAGGATA | hairpin 5 |