The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
We have used a combination of simulated annealing (SA), molecular dynamics (MD) and locally enhanced sampling (LES) methods in order to predict the favourable topologies and loop conformations of dimeric DNA quadruplexes with T2 or T3 loops. This follows on from our previous MD simulation studies on the influence of loop lengths on the topology of intramolecular quadruplex structures [P. Hazel
The increasing number of DNA G-quadruplex structures determined by X-ray and NMR methods is revealing the high degree of structural plurality available to quadruplex-forming sequences. Parallel or antiparallel dimeric and monomeric quadruplexes have been shown to form, with loops being either parallel (
In order to understand the factors governing the sequence-dependent folding of G-quadruplexes, we have examined the effect of loop length on intramolecular quadruplex structure (
MD simulation methods are commonly used to investigate G-quadruplex structures (
We have recently solved (P. Hazel
We report here on the use of a combination of
The
All the initial model building and structural modifications were carried out with the Insight II suite of programs (Molecular Simulations Inc., San Diego, CA). The T4 loops in the 1JPQ and 1D59 template structures were replaced with T3 or T2 loops, and the backbones were minimized to relieve strain. The 1A6H template already contains a T3 loop, which was either kept as a starting structure, or modified to a T2 one. Loop conformational space was searched with SA procedures using the discover module of Insight II. During all SA runs the residues involved in the G-quartets were kept fixed, and only the loop residues were allowed to move. The SA runs were carried out in implicit solvent, using a distance-dependent dielectric (ε = 4
The structures obtained from the SA runs were clustered into conformational families, according to root mean square (r.m.s.) deviation calculations between all structure pairs. Pairwise r.m.s. deviations between all the structures were calculated, then clustered according to the method used by the NMRCLUST program (
Selected structures from the clusters were subjected to more lengthy MD simulations in explicit solvent using the Amber 7 program. Three K+ ions were placed, one between each G-quartet stack, equidistant from the eight G O6 atoms, when these were not present in the experimental template. Further solution K+ ions were added to neutralize the system, which was then solvated in a pre-equilibrated box of TIP3P water. The box size depended on the system, but always extended at least 10 Å from the solute in every direction. The equilibration procedure consisted of 10 steps, beginning with 1000 steps of minimization and 25 ps of dynamics of the solvent only. The whole system was then minimized for 1000 steps, followed by 3 ps of dynamics with a restraint of 25 kcal.mol−1 on the DNA. The DNA restraint was lowered by 5 kcal.mol−1 during each of the next five 1000-step minimizations. Finally, the system was heated slowly to 300 K over 20 ps, with no further restraints. MD simulations were carried out at 300 K, using a 2 fs time step, with SHAKE applied to constrain the bonds containing hydrogen. The PME method was used to deal with long range electrostatic interactions, and Lennard–Jones interactions were cut off at 10 Å. Similar protocols were found to be reliable in previously reported simulations of G-quadruplexes (
LES simulations were carried out on a subset of loop conformations. After an equilibration period of between 500 ps and 1 ns of dynamics in explicit solvent, five copies of each loop were generated using the Addles module of Amber. Both the LES (loops) and non-LES regions (G-quartets) were maintained at 300 K, using separate water baths. LES simulations were carried out in explicit solvent.
The MM-PBSA method was used to calculate approximate free energies. Snapshots were collected every 20 ps for energetic analysis. The electrostatic contribution to the solvation free energy was calculated using the Delphi II program (BIOSYM., San Diego, CA). Dielectric constants of 1.0 and 80.0 were assigned to solute and solvent, respectively. A grid spacing of 0.5 Å was chosen, with the longest linear dimension of the molecule occupying 80% of this grid. The Amber parm99 charge set and BONDI radii were used (
The SA runs generated large numbers of structures, and only the most frequently repeated conformations were considered. Results from the clustering of lateral T3 loop conformations over both the wide and narrow grooves are shown in
No difference in stability was found between the quadruplexes with different lateral and diagonal T3 loop types. However, both diagonal and lateral (over the wide quadruplex groove) T2 loops were found to be strained in the structures obtained from the SA runs. Diagonal loops have to span an average of 19.5 Å in the G-quadruplex models considered, and lateral (wide groove) loops span an average of 15.5 Å (C4′ to C3′ distances across the groove). As only the loop residues were allowed to move during the conformational search, no effects of the short loop length could be observed on the G-quartets. However, the diagonal and lateral loops over the wider groove themselves appeared to be somewhat strained. This was apparent through the appearance of some increased bond lengths, e.g. P-O3′ or P-O5′ distances of 1.7 Å rather than around 1.6 Å, and was reflected in calculated backbone bond energy contributions. For example T2 diagonal, lateral (wide groove) and lateral (narrow groove) loops had backbone bond energies of 11.1, 11.0 and 2.3 kcal.mol−1, respectively. The T2 short loops were much less conformationally flexible than the T3 loops. Thus the lateral T2 loop over the wide quadruplex groove formed only four different conformations, out of the 200 sampled. This limited number of possible conformations, together with their reduced flexibility suggests that their backbones are under strain. Lateral T2 loops over the narrow quadruplex groove were much more flexible, and many possible conformations were obtained. These have to span an average C4′ to C3′ distance of 12.4 Å. In this case, the flexibility of the backbone suggests that the structures were not under strain. These SA results suggest that T2 loops bridging distances of 15 Å and above are under strain.
Although SA methods in implicit solvent were useful to generate many possible loop conformations, the stability of the resulting conformations could not be assessed. Even if the number of SA runs was large enough to be able to use the number of times a structure appeared as an accurate indicator of stability, no comparisons could be made between the lateral and diagonal loop types. The total potential energies of each system can be calculated using Insight II; however, these are necessarily only approximate values. The calculations include solvent effects using a distance-dependent dielectric, which is only a crude approximation, and do not take entropy into account. Moreover, only the loop residues were allowed to move during the conformational search, meaning that the G-quartets could not respond to any pressure caused by strained loop conformations. In order to further assess the loop stability, fully solvated MD simulations were carried out on a subset of structures. Due to the computational cost of carrying out fully solvated MD simulations, only the most favourable structures from the SA runs were considered.
MD simulations of T3 and T2 loop quadruplexes were carried out on a selected number of structures. The three most frequently occurring T3 lateral loop conformations found for the alternating
The SA runs generated several structures in which the first T residue was positioned in the quadruplex groove (T3-Lw-2, T3-Lw-4 and T3-Lw-6 in
Quadruplex structures with the native 1A6H T3 loops were simulated for 4 ns after mutation of the C residues to G in the quadruplex stem. Multiple loop conformations are present in the NMR structure, and the first PDB entry was chosen for MD. In this, the first T residue is in the quadruplex groove, the third T stacks on the G-quartets, and the second T is pointing into the solvent. Within the first 400 ps of dynamics, the second T residue of both loops formed stacking interactions with either the G-quartets, or the third T residue, and these were stable throughout the simulation. This is in accordance with the NMR structures, with some having both second and third T residues stacking with the G-quartets. The first T residue remained within the quadruplex groove in only one of the loops. In the second loop, this T residue moved into the solution, an arrangement corresponding to the second NMR structure in the 1A6H PDB entry. This simulation revealed that a loop with the first T residue in the quadruplex groove can be stable, although rearrangements to other conformations can also occur (in the 1A6H simulation as well as the T3-Lw-2 simulation described above). The T3 loops were flexible in the NMR structure, and interchange between the different experimental conformations was observed during the simulations. The final loop conformations obtained were similar to the T3-Lw-2 and T3-Lw-6 structures in
Lateral loops over the narrow quadruplex groove in the T3-Ln-2 conformation were also simulated using MD. The loop conformation remained unchanged during a 1 ns equilibration, with two residues forming a stack over the G-quartets, and the first T residue slightly arranged within the quadruplex groove. The loops were more flexible over a 4 ns LES simulation, although no major rearrangements were observed (
A quadruplex with two diagonal T3 loops was subjected to a 4 ns MD simulation. The two loops were found to behave differently during the dynamics. One of the loops remained in the same conformation throughout the dynamics, with the first T residue bound deep within the quadruplex groove (
Most sampled loop conformations were stable over nanosecond timescales, however interchange between different loop conformations was observed. Similar loop conformations exhibited different behaviour within the same simulation, suggesting that several T3 loop conformations are equally possible. Unstable loops did not generally affect the stability of the G-quadruplex stem, which always had lower r.m.s. deviations. These results are encouraging in that there was generally a good agreement between the conformations found in the SA runs and during the dynamics. Conformations adopted during the MD simulations were generally structurally close to structures previously generated in the SA runs. The diagonal loop simulation outlined some of the main difficulties when using theoretical models as starting structures in MD simulations. Small differences in loop conformation can lead to major structural changes over long timescales, and it can be difficult to establish whether the differences are due to the general loop conformation or to the particular starting structure which was used. Both simulated lateral T3-Lw-3 loop conformations suggested that having the first T residue located within the quadruplex groove is not the most stable conformation, as rearrangements occurred. However, this conformation was stable during a simulation of the 1A6H experimental structure with T3 loops. The results from MD simulations are therefore highly dependent on the initial starting structure.
MD simulations of quadruplexes with T2 loops were much more dependent upon the loop type, compared to the T3 loop simulations. The diagonal T2 loop quadruplex was very unstable during the simulation. After only 400 ps of dynamics, the G-quartet below the T2 loop was severely distorted, as shown in
Using SA and MD, stable conformations with both lateral and diagonal T3 loops were found. Absolute free energy calculations using MM-PBSA were carried out in order to energetically rank the different structures, and the results are summarized in
The solute entropic contribution was not included in the G values in
MM-PBSA calculations were also carried out in order to differentiate between the stable T2 lateral and parallel loop quadruplexes which were obtained. The decomposition of the free energy into loop and stem components, as used above, is inappropriate in this case, due to the completely different manner in which lateral and parallel loops interact with the G-quartets. Antiparallel quadruplex loops (lateral or diagonal) interact primarily with the G-quartet face. On the other hand, the parallel quadruplex loops interact with the groove region of the quadruplex. Only overall free energies of parallel and antiparallel quadruplexes can therefore be compared. The lateral (narrow groove) quadruplex was more favourable than the parallel quadruplex, with
Both X-ray (Hazel
There is experimental evidence suggesting that T3 loops are flexible, and able to adopt several distinct conformations. Thus several loop conformations have been found by NMR methods to exist in solution, although the overall loop conformation is always conserved (with the first loop residue located within the quadruplex groove, and the second and third residues above the G-quartets) (
It has been shown above that the conformations of T3 loops in dimeric quadruplexes were difficult to predict with MD simulations because a number of conformers were found to be possible. This was not the case for dimeric quadruplexes containing T2 loops, whose structures are constrained by the limited span of the 2 nt loop. In this case, the particular loop conformation is less important, as certain T2 loop structures were found to be unstable due to strain in the loop backbone. The T2 loops were found to be unable to form diagonal loops, and quadruplex structures with two lateral loops over the wide quadruplex groove were also distorted (
A d(G4T2G4) head-to-head dimer, with loops over the narrow and wide grooves was stable over a 4 ns simulation, and the loop residues were able to form stacking interactions with the G-quartets (
One of the limitations of MD simulations of quadruplex structures is their inability to differentiate between K+ and Na+ ion binding within the channel. All simulations in this work were carried out with K+ ions bound within the quadruplex channel. This is in contrast to the d(TG4T2G4T) NMR structure, which was determined in Na+ ion containing solution. The different ions are, however, not expected to affect the results, as strain was the dominant factor in the simulations, and this is unlikely to be affected by different channel ions.
We have shown here that dimeric DNA quadruplexes with 3 nt-loops can adopt a wide range of conformations. NMR and crystal structures of quadruplexes with T3 loops indicate a preference for lateral over diagonal loops. This was not fully reproduced during the simulations. Even though the most favourable T3 loop found was indeed a lateral loop, diagonal loop conformations were found which had similar free energies. Moreover, simulations were unable to unambiguously identify the favoured lateral T3 loop conformation found both in the crystal and in solution. However, the small free energy differences between the T3 loop types simulated are also in accord with experimental findings. Thus NMR studies of these structures have shown that the loop regions are flexible, while loops over both the wide and narrow quadruplex grooves were found in the d(
Shorter T2 loops in these quadruplexes do restrict the conformational flexibility of the quadruplexes. Simulations suggested that the structures adopted by sequences with T2 loops in solution may be governed by loop length, rather than only by the stability of the G-quartet cores. These simulations, and the d(G4T3G4) X-ray structures solved by us, both suggest that G-quartets, which have alternating
These simulations emphasize the influence of loop length on the folding of G-quadruplexes, in accord with earlier NMR studies (
This study, together with our previous one (
Supplementary Data are available at NAR online.
The authors are grateful to The Association for International Cancer Research for a studentship (to P.H.), and to Cancer Research UK for a programme grant (to S.N.). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by JISC.
Schematic diagrams of the (
Structures with lateral T3 loops over the wide quadruplex groove, generated during SA runs. (
Structures with lateral T3 loops over the narrow quadruplex groove, generated using SA. (
T3 lateral loop final structures after LES simulations. (
T3 diagonal loop MD simulation. (
T2 final loop conformations after 4 ns MD simulation (400 ps only for the diagonal loop). (
MD simulations of (
(
Free energies (kcal.mol−1) calculated using the MM-PBSA method for the T3 loop quadruplexes
| Loop conformation |
|
|
|
|
−TStotal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3-Lw-1 (before LES) | −4526 (4) | −3628 (4) | −449 (4) | −449 (4) | −585 (2) |
| T3-Lw-1 (after LES) | −4545 (4) | −3632 (4) | −451 (4) | −581 (1) | |
| T3-Lw-5 (from T3-Lw-1 LES) | −461 (4) | ||||
| T3-Lw-3 (from 1A6H MD)b | −4522 (5) | −3620 (4) | −455 (4) | −582 (1) | |
| T3-Lw-4 (from 1A6H MD) | −447 (4) | ||||
| T3-Lw-2 (before LES) | −4517 (5) | −3626 (4) | −442 (4) | −449 (4) | −580 (2) |
| T3-Lw-2 (after LES) | −4543 (5) | −3636 (4) | −456 (4) | −451 (4) | −586 (1) |
| T3-Ln-1 (before LES) | −4524 (4) | −3633 (4) | −446 (4) | −446 (4) | −582 (1) |
| T3-Ln-1 (after LES) | −4532 (4) | −3634 (4) | −451 (4) | −448 (4) | −582 (1) |
| T3-D-1 | −4525 (5) | −3623 (4) | −452 (4) | −451 (4) | −579 (1) |
Values were calculated before and after LES simulations (apart for the 1A6H template and diagonal loop simulations, for which LES simulations were not carried out). Standard errors of the mean are in parentheses. The entropic contribution was calculated using T = 300 K.
a
bValues calculated after a 2 ns equilibration.