These authors contribute equally to the paper.
MINT‐7968768, MINT‐7968779:
Stress granules (SGs) are dynamic dense structures that are rapidly formed in the cytosol in response to a variety of environmental stress stimuli. Stress conditions induce extensive reprogramming in mRNA metabolism including induction of transcription and translation of specific genes to repair stress‐induced damage and adapt to changed conditions. As a consequence, many other genes are silenced via the recruitment of mRNA into SG that stalled with translation pre‐initiation complexes
Several components of SGs have been identified, but their composition is still only partially known. SGs are composed of mRNAs in conjunction with a subset of translation initiation factors, including eIF2, eIF2B, eIF4E, the 40S ribosomal subunit, as well as RNA binding proteins. Notable RNA‐binding proteins in SGs include TIA‐1
Tudor‐SN protein was first identified as a coactivator of EBNA2 (Epstein‐Barr virus nuclear protein 2)
COS‐7 cells and HeLa cells were cultured as described previously
Plasmids encoding GFP epitope‐tagged G3BP (GFP‐G3BP) was kindly provided by Dr. Jamal Tazi. The pSG5 expression plasmids containing full‐length Tudor‐SN tagged with Flag epitope (pSG5‐Tudor‐SN), the pGEXT‐4T‐1 plasmids containing SN domain (GST‐SN, 1‐639aa), TSN domain (GST‐TSN, 640–885aa) or Tudor domain (678–769aa, GST‐TD) of Tudor‐SN protein were generated as previously described [
GST (glutathione S‐transferase) pull down experiments were performed as previously described
The cell‐free in vitro translation of full‐length G3BP was carried out in a nuclease‐treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) system (Promega BioSciences, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The proteins were labeled with L‐[35S]‐methionine (Amersham Biosciences, USA).
The total cell lysates of HeLa cells without stress stimuli were collected with Nonidet P‐40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 300 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P‐40, 20% glycerol, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium butyrate), and then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN or anti‐G3BP (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), as well as rabbit polyclonal IgG (Santa Cruz biotechnology) as control, followed by incubation with protein‐G/A‐Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The bound proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and blotted with anti‐Tudor‐SN or anti‐G3BP antibody. The mouse monoclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN antibody was generated against SN4 domain (amino acids 507–674) of Tudor‐SN in Dr. Silvennoinen's lab. The rabbit polyclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN antibody was generated against TSN domain (amino acids 640–885) of Tudor‐SN in our lab.
Cells were grown on glass cover slips. Cellular stress was induced either by treatment with 0.5 mM sodium arsenite (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), or by incubation at 45 °C for different time point (Heat shock). Control cells and treated cells were fixed and permeabilized, and then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti‐G3BP and rabbit polyclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN antibodies, or mouse monoclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN and rabbit polyclonal anti‐TIA‐1 (Santa Cruz biotechnology). After washing, cells were incubated with anti‐mouse Alexa fluor 488 (Invitrogen) and anti‐rabbit Texas‐red (Molecular probes, Eugene, Oregan USA) conjugated secondary antibodies. Confocal images were collected using LSM5 program and Zeiss confocal microscope, equipped with an Argon laser (488 nm) and HeNe laser (543 nm) and a ×63 objective. Green emission was detected using a 505‐nm low pass filter and red emission using a 630‐nm low pass filter
For living cell imaging, HeLa cells were transfected with GFP‐tagged G3BP, and RFP‐Tudor‐SN, RFP‐SN or RFP‐TSN, respectively by using FuGENE transfection reagent according to the manufacturers’ procedures. As a control, HeLa cells were transfected with empty vector pEGFP‐C1 and p Cherry‐C1. After 24 h, the cells were seeded onto glass‐bottom dishes (Mat‐Tek, Ashland, MA) and cultured overnight. Before observation, the cells with 2 ml culture medium were maintained in a chamber system at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The images of timed series were acquired as described above.
HeLa cells were transfected with Tudor‐SN siRNA or scramble siRNA according to previously described
Cell proliferation was measured with MTS assay. Briefly, cells were plated in 96‐well plates at a density of 2 × 103 per well and incubated for 24 h or 48 h, and then the cells were incubated with 20 μl of MTS solution (Promega) for 4 h at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm using ELISA microplate reader Multiskan (Thermo Labsystems).
Tudor‐SN is a multi functional protein composed of four repeats of SN and a Tudor domain followed by a SN5 domain (
SN domain of Tudor‐SN protein interacts with G3BP protein in vitro. (A) The schematic structure of Tudor‐SN protein. (B) The loading control of GST, GST‐SN, GST‐TSN and GST‐TD fusion proteins for (C) and (D), are visualized by Coomassie blue. (C) COS‐7 cells were transfected with GFP‐G3BP. After 36 h, the total cell lysate (TCL) were collected and incubated with beads‐bound GST, or different GST fusion proteins. The interacted proteins were subjected to SDS–PAGE and analyzed by blotting with anti‐GFP antibody. Twenty percent of TCL was included as input. (D) G3BP was 35S‐labeled by in vitro translation and incubated with beads loaded with different GST fusion proteins or GST. The bound proteins were subjected to SDS–PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. Twenty percent of the in vitro‐translated protein was included as input.
To substantiate the in vivo interaction of Tudor‐SN and G3BP, the co‐immunoprecipitation experiment was performed with endogenous proteins of HeLa cells. As shown in
Physical interactions between endogenous Tudor‐SN and G3BP in vivo. (A) The total cell lysate of HeLa cells was immunoprecipitated with mouse monoclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN antibody, or polyclonal rabbit IgG antibody as negative control. The precipitated proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE and blotted with anti‐Tudor‐SN antibody (upper panel). The same filter was stripped and re‐blotted with anti‐G3BP antibody (lower panel). (B) The total cell lysate of HeLa cells was immunoprecipitated with anti‐G3BP antibody, or polyclonal rabbit IgG antibody as negative control. The precipitated proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE and blotted with anti‐G3BP antibody (upper panel). The same filter was stripped and re‐blotted with anti‐Tudor‐SN antibody (lower panel). Twenty percent of TCL was included as input in (A) and (B).
G3BP plays an essential role in SGs formation. To investigate whether Tudor‐SN is also involved in SGs, we examined the localization of endogenous Tudor‐SN and G3BP in response to heat shock for different time points. As shown in
Tudor‐SN distributes to the stress granules under stress condition. (A) The endogenous Tudor‐SN co‐localizes with G3BP in stress granules after heat shock treatment. HeLa cells were left untreated (a–c), or heat shocked by incubation at 45 °C for 10 min (d–f), 30 min (g–i) or 60 min (j–l). Cells were fixed and stained with rabbit polyclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN and mouse monoclonal anti‐G3BP antibodies, followed by Alexa 488 and Texas Red‐conjugated secondary antibodies. (B) The endogenous Tudor‐SN co‐localizes with TIA‐1 in stress granules after heat shock treatment at 45 °C for 45 min. Cells were fixed and stained with rabbit polyclonal anti‐TIA‐1 and mouse monoclonal anti‐Tudor‐SN antibodies, followed by Alexa 488 and Texas Red‐conjugated secondary antibodies. Confocal images were collected using LSM510 program and Zeiss confocal microscope with a ×63 objective. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Furthermore, we overexpressed GFP‐G3BP and RFP‐Tudor‐SN in HeLa cells, and then performed kinetic experiments to monitor the assembly of SGs in living cells treated with 0.5 mM sodium arsenite. The results in
Kinetic experiments to monitor the assembly of SGs in living cells. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP‐G3BP and RFP‐Tudor‐SN, and cultured for 24 h. Sodium arsenite (0.5 mM) was then added to initiate the stress response. Cellular fluorescence was viewed and photographed for the same living cells at the indicated time points (0 min, 5 min, 10 min and 20 min) from the start of the treatment. The represented co‐localization of GFP‐G3BP and RFP‐Tudor‐SN are indicated by the write squares in each panel, and the enlarged insets were shown on the right side. Scale bar, 10 μm. The white arrows in a–c, indicated the overexpression of GFP‐G3BP induced the assembly of SGs in the absence of stress stimuli, and ectopically expressed RFP‐Tudor‐SN recruited into the same foci. The white arrows in the insets indicate the formation of SGs in the absent of stress stimuli.
Next we investigated whether the SN domain of Tudor‐SN participates in the SGs assembly. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP‐G3BP and RFP‐Tudor‐SN, RFP‐SN, or RFP‐TSN, respectively. After 24 h, the cells were seeded on glass cover slips, and then treated with either sodium arsenite or heat shock. The images were collected with confocal microscope. In normal cells, RFP‐Tudor‐SN (
SN domain of Tudor‐SN protein co‐localizes with G3BP in stress granules. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP‐G3BP with RFP‐Tudor‐SN (A), RFP‐SN (B), or RFP‐TSN (C), respectively. HeLa cells were also transfected with GFP and RFP vector as control (D). 24 h after transfection, the cells were either untreated, or treated with 0.5 mM sodium arsenite for 45 min, or heat shocked at 45° for 45 min. The localization of the GFP‐ or RFP fusion protein was analyzed by confocal microscopy. The enlarged insets were shown on the lower part. Scale bar, 10 μm. The white arrows in the insets indicate the formation of SGs in the absent of stress stimuli.
To investigate the significance of Tudor‐SN in the formation of stress granules, we performed knockdown experiments with siRNAs which directed against Tudor‐SN or scrambled siRNA as control. As shown in
Tudor‐SN affects the aggregation of SGs. (A) Endogenous Tudor‐SN was sufficiently down‐regulated with RNA interference. The cell lysate of HeLa cells transfected with Tudor‐SN siRNA, or scrambled siRNA were loaded onto SDS–PAGE and then blotted with anti‐Tudor‐SN (upper panel), anti‐G3BP (middle panel) or anti‐GAPDH as control (lower panel). (B) Transfection of Tudor‐SN siRNA inhibits cell proliferation. HeLa cells and their transfectants were cultured in 96‐well plates at 2 × 103 per well for 24 and 48 h. The cell growth was assessed by MTS assay. Values are presented as the mean ± S.D. of three experiments with triple samples. (a) Compared with parental control. (b) Compared with scramble siRNA control. ∗,
Tudor‐SN, also known as p100 or SND1, is a ubiquitously expressed protein and highly conserved in eukaryotes except
Consistent with the structure architecture and functional consequence, Tudor‐SN could recognize hyper‐edited double‐stranded RNAs (I‐dsRNAs) which are generated during stress, as a result, induces SG assembly
In the present study, we clarified that the SN domain, but not the Tudor containing TSN domain of Tudor‐SN, is responsible for the recruitment to SGs. This is based on the observations that SN domain directly interacts with the 35S‐labled in vitro translated G3BP in the in vitro binding assay, and recruited to the SGs with G3BP. It is the first report that the SN domain is related to the SG formation. Recent evidence indicates that the SN domain of Tudor‐SN mediates the interaction with AT1R 3′‐UTR, and leads to both stabilization and enhanced translation of AT1R 3′‐UTR
Accumulating evidences indicate that the formation of SGs may relate to diseases. For example, the SGs formed within the tumors in the hypoxic area which are thought to contribute to the radio‐resistance of the tumor vasculature
Stress could facilitate the cells to form SGs to protect RNAs from damaging condition. On the other hand, stress could also induce apoptosis. The consequence is dictated by the intensity of stress, as well as cell intrinsic pathways. However, the underline mechanisms remain unclear. Intriguingly, Caspase 3 could cleave Tudor‐SN between Tudor and SN5 domains during stress‐induced apoptosis, and this cleavage inhibits its ribonuclease activity
We thank Dr. Jamal Tazi for GFP‐G3BP plasmids, Dr. Johan Peranen for vector pCherry‐C1. This work was supported by grants from (2007AA02Z115), NSFC (90919032, 30970562, 30670441), 973 program (2009CB918903), Specialized Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20091202110001), TSTC (08ZCGHHZ01900, 08JCYBJC07700), Tianjin Educational Committee Foundation (2008ZD01), Medical Research Council of Academy of Finland, Finnish Foundation for Cancer Research.