When viruses cross species barriers, they often change their biological and pathogenetic properties. In the author's laboratory the nonproductive interaction of Syrian hamster cells with human adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) has been studied. Ad12 induces undifferentiated tumors in newborn hamsters (
Viruses have evolved as biological elements with a highly select coordination to specific hosts and/or host cells. There are numerous steps in the interaction between a virus and its host that have to be optimized for the virus to be capable of undergoing a fully productive replicative cycle in the most permissive cell system. These parameters range from the attachment of the viral particle on the cell surface to the mechanisms of release of the newly assembled virions from the infected cell or organism. This adaptive process involves a large number of different viral and cellular proteins, whose optimized activities and interactions are required to proceed at a unique temporal schedule during the viral replication program. Any deviation from this—in evolutionary terms—presently normalized standard invariably will entail the loss of or decrease in viral reproduction.
There exists, however, a corollary in the philosophy of viral strategies. “Smart viruses” are those that abstain from killing the host cell, admittedly at the expense of maximal viral output, but at the gain of some other, usually long-term, advantage for this particular virus in an environment that has developed antiviral strategies. There are numerous ways for viruses to achieve the goal of long-term survival, if only for immortalizing their genomes and to scheme for better times or circumstances for the rescue of the informational essence of the virion.
A not infrequently chosen contingency resides in taking refuge in a different host, although the virus initially cannot anticipate whether such untested territory will be amenable to and prove useful for viral survival. In its endeavor to survive, however, the viral parasite will breach a crucial law of survival—the respect for host specificity—and may cross species barriers, thus attempting the “unspeakable” in order to gain unprecedented, if unpredictable, advantages.
In many instances, the outcome of such viral experimentation will be frustrated. Nevertheless, the large number of virions usually produced in productive infections allows for many failures during risky adventures into unproven territories. The survivors of the successful events in these interactions are viruses that we encounter as “evolving viruses” with quite uncharacteristic and unforeseeable properties, which can cause catastrophic problems in medical virology. Many of the truly lethal viruses of present medical practice have evolved through such strategies of still poorly understood switches in their host ranges. Among others, viruses that presently raise serious concerns in the medical community include HIV 1 and 2, coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome, Marburg virus, and avian influenza virus H5N1 (
There are representatives of this class of viruses that have less immediate medical relevance but, nevertheless, have significance as models to study the essentials of nonproductive virushost transitions. In my laboratory we have studied human adenovirus (Ad) type 12 and its interaction with cells from the Syrian hamster (
Among the factors contributing to the oncogenic potential of Ad12 in Syrian hamsters are the following:
The abortive mode of infection and the survival and continued growth of Ad12- infected hamster cells ( The insertion of Ad12 DNA into the host genome ( Alterations of cellular DNA methylation and transcription patterns ( The Ad12 E1 and E4 gene products (reviewed in Downregulation of cellular major histocompatibility complex genes by Ad12 ( Downregulation of cellular defense genes by Ad12 ( Many additional unknown factors.
In the first, major, part of this chapter, concepts for the study of the abortive Ad12—hamster cell system and of the tumor production by Ad12 in newborn hamsters will be described. The second part will present a Abstract of the techniques employed in these studies.
Primary hamster cells or the baby hamster kidney (BHK21) cell line are nonpermissive for infection with Ad12; the infection is abortive. However, the same cells are permissive for infection with Ad2, and this infection is productive ( Ad12 adsorbs to the hamster cell surface, although much less efficiently than to human cells ( Ad12 particles enter the cytoplasm. Ad12 DNA can be found in the nuclei of hamster cells ( Ad12 DNA associates with the chromosomes ( Ad12 DNA can integrate into the host chromosome ( Some of the early Ad12 functions are transcribed, although inefficiently ( By DNA array analyses, a limited number of changes in cellular transcription patterns can be documented upon the infection of BHK21 cells with Ad12 (Dorn, A. and Doerfler, W. unpublished results). Ad12 DNA replication cannot be detected ( Ad12 VA and L1 RNAs are not transcribed ( The region downstream of the major late promoter (MLP) of Ad12 DNA carries a 33-bp-long mitigator element,* which inactivates the MLP in hamster cells ( Late Ad12 genes are not detectably transcribed (
There is no cytopathic effect in Ad12-infected hamster cells (the infected cells continue to replicate [ As one of the biological consequences of the abortive infection of hamster cells, Ad12 induces undifferentiated tumors in newborn hamsters. (Ad2 fails to do so. The abortive mode of infection enables the Ad12 genome to become permanently fixed in the host genome and to survive for many cell generations. Productive infections would kill all infected cells.)
In the search for factors missing in hamster cells that would sustain Ad12 replication, we have tried to complement these defects in a stepwise manner. The nonpermissiveness of hamster cells for Ad12 replication seemed to be restricted to this particular serotype (since Ad2 underwent productive replication in hamster cells). Hence, there had to be a highly specialized barrier or barriers preventing Ad12 replication in hamster cells.
BHK297-C131 hamster cells ( Ad12 DNA can replicate to a limited extent. Ad12 late transcripts are synthesized. Ad12 fiber mRNA is transcribed, and has the correct nucleotide sequence, tripartite leader and polyA tail. However, fiber protein is not produced (raising the possibility of an additional translational block in this Ad5-E1-complemented hamster cell system). Ad12 virions are not made.
We conclude that the availability of apparently sufficient concentrations of the Ad5 E1 functions facilitates the activation of Ad12 replication and transcription machinery. Although the late fiber mRNA seems to have most, if not all, properties of
The cloned pTP or E1A gene under the control of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) promoter was transfected into BHK21 cells, which were subsequently infected with Ad12. The results were (
Following transfection, the human Coxsackie Ad receptor gene was transiently overexpressed in BHK21 hamster cells, which were subsequently infected with Ad12 at 8 h after transfection (
In a previous study on Ad12 infection of human embryonic kidney cells, we demonstrated that the extracellular virions, which were isolated from the medium, had a 10-fold higher specific infectivity per virus particle than the intracellular virions (
Ad12 can transform hamster cells in culture at extremely low efficiency. However, after injection into newborn Syrian hamsters (
All tumor cells carry multiple copies of integrated, but no free, Ad12 DNA. Ad12 DNA usually inserts at only one chromosomal site. In rare instances (1/60), two insertion sites of Ad12 DNA in the hamster tumor genome have been observed (
When foreign DNA, such as Ad12 DNA in hamster cells, is genomically integrated into a mammalian genome, it frequently becomes Gene inactivation in transgenic cells and organisms. Genetic imprinting. X-chromosome inactivation. Altered transcription patterns during embryonal development. Long-term silencing of retrotransposons. Changes in transcription patterns in tumor cells. Cloning of organisms. Gene therapy.
The insertion of foreign (Ad12, lambda, or plasmid) DNA into established mammalian genomes can be associated with extensive alterations in DNA methylation patterns in repetitive DNA sequences, e.g., the retrotransposon genomes of the intracisternal A particles (
When Ad12-induced tumor cells are passaged continuously in culture, spontaneous revertants of these tumor cells occasionally arise that exhibit altered (usually more fibroblastic) morphology and have lost all or next to all integrated viral DNA sequences. These revertants still retain their oncogenic potential when reinjected into hamsters (
The Ad12-transformed hamster cell line T637 was derived by infecting cells of the BHK21 hamster fibroblast line (
In the TR3 revertant of T637 cells, Ad12 DNA could no longer be detected in the cellular genome (
40 m Sodium bisulfite stock: prepare by dissolving 8.1 g of sodium bisulfite in 16 mL of degassed water by gently inverting the tube; 1 mL of 40 m Glassmilk (Gene Clean II Kit Bio 101 Inc., Nista, CA). Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Applied Biosystems 377 DNA sequencer. GeneAmp 9600 system (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Taq DNA polymerase. Avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Tfl DNA polymerase (RT Access Kit, Promega, Madison, WI). 2% Agarose gels. pGEMT vector (Promega, Madison, WI). 1% Igepal CA-630 (Sigma). Pefabloc SC protease inhibitor (Roche). Branson B-12 sonifier. Normal rabbit immunoglobulin G. Protein Aagarose conjugate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Ad12-pTP rabbit antiserum. Proteinase K. ss-M13-DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Positively charged nylon membranes (Roche). Macherey/Nagel kit (Düren, Germany). α- or γ-32P-dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol). Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Sephadex G-50 columns (Roche). DIG hybridization buffer (Roche).
This section will present an overview of the techniques used in our studies on the abortive interaction of Ad12 with hamster cells and on the analyses of Ad12-induced tumor cells. The details of some of these methods are described, unless they are well-known, routinely applied procedures used in molecular virology and biology. Among the more routine-based methods, which are described in detail in several of our referenced publications and will not be repeated here, are construction of expression vectors, expression clones, Southern blotting, analyses of newly synthesized viral/cellular DNA in transfected and infected cells, Western blot analysis, quantitative real-time reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (
Prepare genomic DNAs from Ad12-infected cells or from Ad12-induced hamster tumor cells following standard protocols ( The genomic DNA is then alkali-denatured in 0.3 Subsequently, treat the DNA with sodium bisulfite. Mix the denatured DNA solution (66 μL) with 1.2 mL of the bisulfite solution ( From the above reaction mixture ( For desulfonation, add 3 μL of 10 The solution is thereupon neutralized, the DNA ethanol-precipitated, dried, and redissolved in 20 μL H Amplify selected segments in the promoters by PCR with appropriate oligodeoxyribonucleotide (oligo) primers. Clone reaction products into the pGEMT vector (Promega, Madison, WI) after purification by using the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and transfect into Isolate a number of clones and determine the nucleotide sequences with an Applied Biosystems 377 DNA sequencer.The bisulfite reaction (
Perform PCR amplification in a reaction volume of 25 μL in a GeneAmp 9600 system by using 250 ng of bisulfite-treated genomic DNA, 10 m Amplification conditions are as follows: After the initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 s, annealing for 15 s at temperatures between 51°C and 57°C, and an extension reaction at 72°C for 30 s follows. A final extension step at 72°C for 5 min terminates the reaction.
Reverse transcription reactions are performed in a one-step protocol, with 100–300 ng of DNase I-treated total RNA by using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase and Tfl DNA polymerase following the manufacturer's guidelines. The RT reaction is carried out at 48°C for 45 min, followed by PCR with 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 1 min and elongation at 68°C for 2 min. Subsequently, a final elongation step at 68°C for 7 min is applied. All reverse transcription (RT)-PCR reaction products are analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels and are stained with ethidium bromide. Products in the size range predicted from the published DNA sequence are purified from the gel, subcloned into the pGEM-T vector, and the DNA is sequenced.
Transfect BHK21 cells with the cloned Ad12-pTP DNA by electroporation. At 18 h after transfection, infect the cells with 100 plaque-forming units of Ad12 per cell. At 28 h p.i., suspend about 107 cells in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Igepal CA-630, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 4 m The cells are disrupted by ultrasonic treatment for 2 min in a branson B-12 sonifier. After removal of cell debris, treat cell extracts for 1 h at 4°C with 1.0 μg of normal rabbit immunoglobulin G and 20 μL of protein A—agarose conjugate. Subsequently the beads are pelleted, and the lysate is incubated at 4°C overnight with 15 μL of Ad12-pTP rabbit antiserum and 30 μL of protein A—agarose. Immunoprecipitates are collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 For the release of Ad12 DNA from this complex, suspend the beads in 50 μL of 10 m This protocol is described in
Ad12-specific DNA segments corresponding to 28 different open reading frames of Ad12 DNA are amplified by PCR using appropriate primers and are cloned into M13mp18 vector DNA as described ( Prepare single-stranded (ss) M13-Ad12 DNAs (we used 28 different clones) using the ss-M13-DNA purification kit. Denature the ssDNAs in 0.4 For reverse transcription and 32P-labeling of cDNA, total RNA from mock- or Ad12-infected cells is isolated by using a Macherey/Nagel kit. In this reaction, 5 μg of RNA, 2 µg of oligo (dT) 12–18 primers, and 1 m Subsequently, the 32P-labeled probes are purified by gel filtration on Sephadex G-50 columns and are hybridized to DNA arrays on membranes at 42°C for 20 h in DIG hybridization buffer. Wash membranes three times for 20 min in 0.5X standard sodium citrate, 1% SDS at 65°C and expose for 14 h (HeLa-Ad12) or 48 h (BHK21-Ad12) to X-ray films. For many years, research in the author's laboratory was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Bonn, Germany (through SFBs 74 and 274 and grant DO 165/17), by the Wilhelm Sander Foundation, Munich, by Amaxa GmbH, Cologne, and recently by the Institute for Clinical and Molecular Virology, University Erlangen—Nürnberg.