N1-meA and N3-meC are cytotoxic DNA base methylation lesions that can accumulate in the genomes of various organisms in the presence of SN2 type methylating agents. We report here the structural characterization of these base lesions in duplex DNA using a cross-linked protein–DNA crystallization system. The crystal structure of N1-meA:T pair shows an unambiguous Hoogsteen base pair with a
Genomic DNA is constantly subjected to modifications caused by exogenous environmental chemicals and cellular metabolites. Among various DNA damages, nucleobase damage is a common type that can be induced by oxidation, hydrolysis and alkylation (
Structural characterization of base lesions in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is important to understand the origin of their mutagenic or cytotoxic effects. The structural information may also help to reveal how the lesions are detected and repaired by DNA repair proteins. Despite considerable advances in DNA structure characterization (
Alkylated nucleobases are produced mostly by endogenous and environmental alkylation agents (
This host–guest-like system is validated through the structural characterization of the methylation base modifications N1-meA, N3-meC and N6-meA in dsDNA cross-linked to ABH2. In these structures, N1-meA forms an unambiguous anti-Hoogsteen base pair to the opposite T; N3-meC does not form any hydrogen-bonding interaction with the opposite G, but stays partially intrahelical inside the duplex DNA.
Oligonucleotides containing disulfide-tethered cytosine and specific base lesions were synthesized using the phosphoramidite derivative of
The
DNA duplexes were annealed by mixing 1 mM thiol-tether containing strand with the corresponding complimentary strand in buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4) and 100 mM NaCl, incubating at 75°C for 10 min and cooling to 4°C by a step gradient of −1°C/min. The cross-linked complexes of protein ABH2-ΔN55 E175C with synthetic oligonucleotides were achieved by incubating dsDNA (1 mM, 50 µl) with protein (1.2 eq.) in 5 ml of buffer [100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4)] at 14°C for 16 h. The covalently linked ABH2–DNA complexes were purified using MonoQ anion exchange chromatography (GE healthcare), then buffer exchanged to a solution containing 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) (
Protein–dsDNA complex crystals were grown by hanging drop vapor diffusion crystallization at 4°C in drops containing 1 µl of complex solution and 1 µL of reservoir solution of 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM cacodylate (pH 6.5) and 12% 5 K PEG. Hexagonal rod-shaped crystals grew in 1–2 weeks at 4°C. Subsequently, crystals were transferred to a cryoprotectant solution composed of 80% reservoir solution and 20% glycerol and frozen in liquid nitrogen before data collection. An X-ray data set (diffracted to 2.0 Å) for the N1-meA-containing complex (ABH2–N1-meA) crystals and an X-ray data set (diffracted to 1.8 Å) for the N6-meA-containing complex (ABH2–N6-meA) were collected at beamline 23ID-B (General Medicine and Cancer Institutes Collaborative Access Team [GM/CA-CAT]) of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory. The N3-meC-containing complex (ABH2–N3-meC) gave the best crystals that diffracted to 2.0 Å ( Data collection and refinement statistics aValues in parentheses refer to the highest resolution bins. b cCrystal ABH2–N1-meA:T ABH2–N6-meA:T ABH2–N3-meC:G Data quality Resolution (Å) 20–2.0 (2.05–2.0) 20–1.8 (1.77–1.8) 20–2.0 (1.95–2.0) Unique reflections 29687 38371 31492 Completeness 99.9 (99.9) 99.9 (100) 98.3 (78.6) Redundancy 20.0 20.3 21.1 < 24.3 (2.6) 32.6 (1.6) 36.2 (2.2) Crystal parameters Space group P6522 P6522 P6522 Cell constants (Å) Refinement Resolution (Å) 20–2.0 20–1.77 20–1.95 20.2 21.0 20.5 23.7 23.6 23.6 Model quality R.m.s. deviation bond (Å) 0.015 0.010 0.0107 R.m.s. deviation angle (°) 1.58 1.53 1.57 Average B factor 27.7 29.2 36.5 Average B factor of Protein 27.1 27.9 34.6 Average B factor of DNA 23.1 29.0 39.6 Average B factor of water 39.4 42.5 45.3 Model content Protein residues 56–258 56–258 56–258 Nucleotides 26 26 26 Water atoms 197 222 179 PDB accession code 3H8O 3H8R 3H8X
The ABH2–dsDNA complex structures were phased by molecular replacement [using Phaser (
In an attempt to crystallize duplex DNAs containing the methylated base N1-meA and N3-meC, we employed the Dickerson–Drew dodecamer sequence ( Crystal structure of the ABH2–dsDNA complex. (
The structures of ABH2–N1-meA and ABH2–N6-meA overlap well with the original structure 3BTX ( Interaction of ABH2 protein to the dsDNA backbone. (
A superposition of the structure of ABH2–N3-meC to 3BTX shows an apparent DNA backbone shift toward the 3′-end of the complementary strand (
Besides minor shift and rotation, the packing of the dsDNA helix in ABH2–N1-meA is similar to the unlesioned DNA in 3BTX ( Diagram of the dsDNA1 structure containing N1-meA:T. ( Structure of DNA1 with N1-meA or N6-meA lesion opposite with T. (
To perform a detailed analysis of the distortion of the duplex structure caused by the N1-meA lesion, the structure of the N1-meA-containing oligonucleotide was superimposed onto that of the N6-meA-containing DNA ( Helix parameters of the dsDNA with N1-meA:T pair (light gray) and the one with N6-meA:T (dark grey), as calculated by program 3DNA v1.5. The base pairs are numbered from G3·C12′ to G13·C2′ in the absence of the C*7·A8′ mismatch and the steps are numbered from G3·C12′/T4·A11′ to C12·G3′/G13·C2′ without two steps neighbored to the C*7·A8′ mismatch. Most of the remarkable changes are at the local position of the N1-meA:T pair.
A Hoogsteen base pair between N1-meA10 and the opposite base T5′ is clearly observed with two hydrogen bonds formed between these two bases (N2_ N1-meA10 … O4_T5′, 3.1 Å; N7_ N1-meA10 … N3_ T5′, 3.2 Å; Structure comparison of N1-meA:T lesion with N6-meA:T base pair. (
Since the protein has no direct contact to the base pairing region around N1-meA10 or N6-meA10, an alignment of the two duplex DNAs in this region ( Comparison of base pair parameters of N1-meA:T, N6-meA:T and T:A aAll data are calculated by Program 3DNA (v1.5) (ref. 37). bParameters for Shear, Stretch and Stagger are distances (Å). Parameters for Buckle, Propeller and Opening are angles (°). cParameters for Shift, Slide and Rise are distances (Å). Parameters for Tilt, Roll and Twist are angles (°).Local base-pair parameters Shear Stretch Stagger Buckle Propeller Opening N1-meA10:T10 0.7 −3.8 −1.1 29.1 7.7 73.6 N6-meA10:T10 −0.05 −0.2 0.01 1.5 −9.2 0.3 T10:A10 −0.05 −0.2 −0.2 1.4 −21.0 −0.5 Local base-pair step parameters Shift Slide Rise Tilt Roll Twist N1-meA T9A/ N1-meA10T −1.7 −3.8 2.4 −175.7 1.1 −47.6 N1-meA10T/G11C −0.8 −3.5 −1.7 135.6 −101.2 132.3 N6-meA T9A/ N6-meA10T −0.2 −0.2 3.4 −0.9 −3.3 38.9 N6-meA10T/G11C 0.4 −0.02 3.2 −2.8 7.0 31.3 3BTX T9A/T10A −0.3 −0.04 3.2 2.9 −3.7 40.2 T10A/G11C 0.8 0.9 3.6 0.4 6.0 37.3
A comparison of the structure of N1-meA:T to that of the Hoogstein base-paired A:T reveals that the same
Due to the lack of hydrogen bonding between N3-meC and the opposite G, the crystal structure of ABH2–N3-meC shows a distorted backbone compared to the complex without the base lesion. The DNA ends are packed differently in two structures ( Diagram of the DNA structure containing N3-meC:G. ( Structure of dsDNA2 with N3-meC lesion opposite with G and its flanking base pairs. (
Cytotoxic damages such as N1-meA and N3-meC can block Watson–Crick base pairing in duplex DNA, which leads to cytotoxic consequences to living cells. These base lesions are efficiently detected and repaired by the AlkB family proteins (
This protein–DNA complex, stabilized by covalent cross-linking between the protein and DNA, affords the first crystal structures of N1-meA and N3-meC in duplex DNA. We show that N1-meA forms a Hoogsteen base pair with the opposite T with the purine ring of N1-meA adopting a
We also report the structure of the ABH2–dsDNA complex containing the N3-meC lesion. The electron density of N3-meC is poor due to the absence of any hydrogen-bonding interaction to the opposing G. However, N3-meC remains intrahelical with a movement of ∼2 Å to the major groove. The opposite guanine is also intrahelical and stacks to the neighboring A11′ and A9′. The disruption of the N3-meC5:G10′ base pair also yields an elongated back-bone P … P distance between C5 to T4 and T6. Furthermore, the flanking base pair between T6 and A9′ is broken, which leads to a Wobble base pairing between T6 and A8′. The melting of the DNA structure around the lesion site generates low thermodynamic stability and produces the distortion of the DNA backbone, an effect that may lead to the loss of interactions between the protein and the backbone around the A6′–C4′ stretch on the complementary strand. These changes in DNA structure may explain why this lesioned base cannot be crystallized through typical DNA-crystallization strategies.
Both N1-meA and N3-meC are efficiently detected and repaired by the AlkB family proteins, yet they show distinct structural features in duplex DNA. The only common property of the base pairs containing these two lesions is the low thermodynamic stability of the local duplex DNA structure induced by the methylation. Thus, the repair proteins could detect unstable regions in the genome to locate these base damages.
We thank the staff at beamline 23BM (General Medicine and Cancer Institute Collaborative Access Team [GM/CA-CAT]) at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory for data collection, and Dr E. Duguid for data processing.