Academic Editor: Dimitris Kessisoglou
A starch-urea-based biodegradable coordination polymer modified by transition metal Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) was prepared by polycondensation of starch and urea. All the synthesized polymeric compounds were characterized by Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), 1H-NMR spectroscopy, 13C-NMR spectroscopy, UV-visible spectra, magnetic moment measurements, differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results of electronic spectra and magnetic moment measurements indicate that Mn(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) complexes show octahedral geometry, while Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes show square planar and tetrahedral geometry, respectively. The thermogravimetric analysis revealed that all the polymeric metal complexes are more thermally stable than the parental ligand. In addition, biodegradable studies of all the polymeric compounds were also carried out through ASTM standards of biodegradable polymers by CO2 evolution method.
Starch-based coordination polymers are known to be completely degradable in soil and water and can promote the degradation of nonbiodegradable material when blended or modified. Starch is one of the main natural polymers studied for the production of biodegradable materials [
Starch, urea, ethanol MERCK (Mumbai), and sodium hydroxide were used without further purification. Solvents such as acetone, DMF, DMSO, and (s.d fine chemicals) methanol were purified by standard procedure before use. Manganese (II) acetate tetrahydrate [Mn(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O], copper (II) acetate monohydrate [Cu(CH3COO)2 · H2O], nickel (II) acetate tetrahydrate [Ni(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O], cobalt (II) acetate tetrahydrate [Co(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O], and zinc (II) acetate dihydrate [Zn(CH3COO)2 · 2H2O] were used without further purification. All the microorganisms were provided by C.S.A. Agricultural University, Kanpur.
The polymeric resin was synthesized by polycondensation of urea and starch in alkaline medium in 1 : 1 molar ratio according to
Metal complexes of poly-SUr were prepared by using molar ratio (1 : 1) of poly-SUr and metal salts. A typical procedure for the preparation of the Cu(II) complex is carried out as 2.22 gm (0.01 mol) of poly-SUr dissolved in a minimum quantity (~25 mL) of hot DMSO and 1.99 gm (0.01 mol) of Cu(II) salt was dissolved in DMSO (~20 mL) separately. Both solutions were filtered and mixed in hot condition with constant stirring. Then the reaction mixture was stirred at 60°C for 4 h. A dark green colored product was obtained which was reprecipitated in distilled water. Finally the product was filtered and washed with alcohol, acetone and dried in a vacuum desiccator on calcium chloride, yield 75%.
A Similar procedure was adopted for the synthesis of the other metal complexes such as poly-SUr-Mn (II), poly-SUr-Co(II, poly-SUr-Ni(II)), and poly-SUr-Zn(II); their yields were between 73%–78%, and the obtained product was found to be soluble in dimethylsulfoxide-d6(DMSO- d6) and insoluble in some common organic solvents and distilled water.
The infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer infrared spectrometer model 621 by using KBr pellets. The 1H-NMR spectra were recorded on a JOEL-FX-100 FT NMR instrument in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. The elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen was carried out on a Perkin-Elmer model-2400 elemental analyzer (CDRI Lucknow). The percentage of metals was determined by complexometric titration against EDTA after decomposing with concentrated nitric acid (HNO3). The solubility of polymeric ligand and its metal polychelates were checked at room temperature in different solvents. The thermal stability of polymer and its metal polychelates have been evaluated for recording thermograms by TA analyzer 2000 at a heating rate of 20°C per minute under Nitrogen atmosphere. The Tg and Tm of the synthesized polymeric resin (SUr) and its metal complex have been evaluated by PYRES DIAMOND DSC instrument. The electronic spectra of the metal complexes were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-EZ 201, and magnetic susceptibility measurements were done with vibrating sample magnetometer. The biodegradable testing was carried out through CO2 evolution method in the laboratory itself.
The polymeric resin (poly-SUr) was prepared by the polycondensation process in the molar ratio of 1 : 1 in alkaline medium, according to
The important IR bands and their assignments of polymeric resin (poly-SUr) and its metal complexes are listed in
The 1H-NMR bands ranges of polymeric resin and its metal complex with Zn (II) are given in
The 13C-NMR band ranges of polymeric resin (poly-SUr) and its metal complex with Zn(II) are given in
The electronic spectra of metal complexes were recorded in DMSO. The electronic spectral bands and their magnetic moments are depicted in
In another study the electronic spectra of the SUr-Cu(II) exhibited two bands, at 15380 cm−1 and 25000 cm−1 due to 2A1g
The thermal decomposition of polymeric resin and its polymer metal complex [SUr-Mn(II)] were studied by the thermogravimetric method. The thermogravimetric curves of polymeric resin and its polymer metal complex are depicted in
The DSC measurement served to determine the glass transition temperature Tg and decomposition behavior, and for this, the calorimetric curves of the polymeric resin and its polymer metal complexes are reported in
It is a laboratory respirometric method that uses compost pile inocula given in
The test method might be carried out in water or soil but latter one is discussed here. Although in both cases a suitable volume of activated sludge to obtain complete mineralization of the sample in about a month is used as inoculums, about 10 cm3 per liter is recommended for aqueous system and we have used 5 cm3 per 50 g with cold medium successfully. The inoculums must be used the same day as collected and kept aerated until used. Also sufficient urea and potassium hydrogen phosphate (0.1 and 0.05 % of weight of polymer substrate) are added to the medium to fortify it and to promote further microbial growth.
The biodegradation rates of starch, polymeric resin, and polymer metal complexes for a comparative study are shown in
Newly developed polymeric resin and its metal complexes were prepared in good yield and characterized by various instrumental techniques. The polymeric resin was soluble in water and DMSO and insoluble in benzene, toluene, and methanol, whereas all the metal complexes were soluble in DMSO and insoluble in water and common organic solvents. It has been observed that the incorporation of metal ion in the polymeric backbone enhances the thermal properties as well as reduced biodegradability, because of the degradable nature of the prepared polymeric resin, which is coordinated to metal ions, and they may be used in various applications of biomedicines and plastic technology. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding of the starch was decreased due to the addition of urea and the thermal behavior of the entire polymer increased by the incorporation of metal salts into the polymeric backbone.
One of the co-authors, Miss Shadma Parveen wishes to acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR, New Delhi, India) for granting Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) vide grant No. 9/466(0097)2K8-EMR-I.
TGA curve of SUr and SUr-Mn(II).
DSC curves of starch urea and its metal complex.
%CO2 mineralization of starch, SUr and SUr-Mn(II).
Elemental analysis and yields of the synthesized polymeric compounds.
| Compounds | Yield | d.p. | Elemental analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (°C) | % C | % H | % N | % M | |
| SUr | 70 | 242 | 38.183 | 5.43 | 12.78 | — |
| 37.10 | 4.64 | 12.85 | ||||
| SUr-Mn(II) | 74 | 282 | 27.44 | 5.01 | 9.10 | 18.11 |
| 26.39 | 4.02 | 9.45 | 18.22 | |||
| SUr-Co(II) | 73 | 292 | 26.84 | 4.50 | 8.99 | 18.81 |
| 26.57 | 4.11 | 8.37 | 18.65 | |||
| SUr-Ni(II) | 76 | 299 | 26.68 | 4.51 | 9.10 | 18.75 |
| 26.10 | 4.36 | 9.97 | 18.10 | |||
| Sur-Cu(II) | 75 | 295 | 29.83 | 3.58 | 10.01 | 22.54 |
| 30.10 | 4.31 | 10.97 | 22.12 | |||
| Sur-Zn(II) | 78 | 286 | 29.63 | 3.55 | 9.94 | 23.04 |
| 30.70 | 3.20 | 9.88 | 23.33 | |||
IR bands of polymeric resin (SUr) and its polymer metal complexes.
| Compounds | O-H |
|
|
CH2 asym-sym | O=C-NH |
|
M-O | M-N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUr | 3402 | 1080 | 1250 | 2936-2850 | 1778 | 1654 | — | — |
| SUr-Ni(II) | 3365 | 1050 | 1210 | 2936-2850 | 1658 | 1610 | 610 | 550 |
| SUr-Mn(II) | 3362 | 1051 | 1211 | 2936-2850 | 1657 | 1612 | 609 | 551 |
| SUr-Zn(II) | 3359 | 1049 | 1213 | 2936-2850 | 1660 | 1614 | 607 | 552 |
| SUr-Cu(II) | 3367 | 1052 | 1216 | 2936-2850 | 1659 | 1613 | 605 | 548 |
| SUr-Co(II) | 3364 | 1053 | 1215 | 2936-2850 | 1660 | 1615 | 603 | 549 |
Number of protons in different environment of SUr and its polymer metal complexes.
| Polymeric resin | Polymer metal complex of Zn(II) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional groups | Peaks | Functional groups | Peaks |
| O=C-NH | 8.394(h) | O=C-NH | 7.94 |
| protons of pyranose rings | 5.079(a) | protons of pyranose rings | 5.418(e) |
| 5.003(d) | 5.000(d) | ||
| 4.718(b) | 4.510(b) | ||
| 3.6999© | 3.330© | ||
| 5.557(e) | O-H protons | 3.415(f) | |
| 3.45(f) | 2.666(g) | ||
| 3.32(g) | |||
Number of carbon atoms in different environment of SUr and its polymer metal complexes.
| Polymeric resin | Polymer metal complexes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional groups | Peaks | Functional groups | Peaks |
| O=C-NH | 159.42(a) | O=C-NH | 155.76 |
| Pyranose carbons | 98.14(b) | pyranose carbon | 78.88(b) |
| 69.89(c,d,f) | 64.53(c,d,f) | ||
| 77.20(e) | 71.63(e) | ||
| 55.67(g) | 54.12(g) | ||
Electronic spectral bands and magnetic moment measurements of polymer metal complexes.
| Complexes | Magnetic moment (B.M.) | Bands cm−1 | Transitions | Geometry | 10Dq | B |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUr-Mn(II) | 5.69 | 25330 |
4A1g(G) |
|||||
| 22980 |
4T2g(G) |
Octahedral | 7960 | 625 | 0.65 | 35 | ||
| 18870 |
4T1g(G) |
|||||||
| SUr-Co(II) | 4.10 | 20400 |
4T1g(F) |
|||||
| 14080 |
4A2g(F) |
Octahedral | 6193 | 729 | 0.75 | 25 | ||
| 9800 |
4T2g(F) |
|||||||
| SUr-Ni(II) | 2.77 | 23809 |
3T1g(P) |
|||||
| 12155 |
3T1g(F) |
Octahedral | 5952 | 744 | 0.69 | 31 | ||
| 8335 |
3T2g(F) |
|||||||
| SUr-Cu(II) | 1.90 | 25000 | Charge transfer spectra | Square planar | — | — | — | — |
| 15380 |
2A1g
|
— | — | — | — | — | ||
| SUr-Zn(II) | — | — | Tetrahedral | — | — | — | — |
Thermal behaviors of SUr and its polymer metal complex of Mn(II).
| Polymeric resin (SUr) | SUr-Mn(II) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | Weight loss (%) | Temperature (°C) | Weight loss (%) |
| 150 | 8 | 150 | 5 |
| 200 | 11 | 200 | 5 |
| 250 | 11 | 250 | 5 |
| 300 | 15 | 300 | 10 |
| 350 | 21 | 350 | 11 |
| 400 | 9 | 400 | 27 |
| 450 | 3 | 450 | 7 |
| 500 | 4 | 500 | 3 |
(a) ASTM standards of biodegradable polymeric compounds.
| Environment | ASTM | Microorganism |
|---|---|---|
| Single species | D5247-92, G-21, G-22 | Species of bacteria and fungi specified |
| Sewage sludge | D5209-91, D5271-92 | Aerobic-activated sludge organisms |
| Marine environment | D5437-93 | Marine algae and invertebrates |
| Compost pile | D5338-93 | Thermophillic microbes in compost |
| Anaerobic environment | D5210-92 | Anaerobic micros from activated sludge |
(b) % CO2 mineralization of starch, SUr, and its polymer metal complex.
| Time (Hrs) | CO2 Mineralization % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Starch | Polymeric resin | Polymer metal complex | |
| 24 | — | 4.8 | 4 |
| 44 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 7.1 |
| 68 | 2.2 | 11 | 8 |
| 92 | 3.7 | 14.5 | 9.7 |
| 110 | 5 | 18 | 12.8 |
| 136 | 9 | 22.5 | 14.5 |
| 160 | 15 | 27 | 17.2 |
| 187 | 18.5 | 27.4 | 17.3 |
| 200 | 18.6 | 27.5 | 20.4 |
(c) Biodegradability of starch, SUr and SUr-Mn(II).
| Material | Biodegradability rate constant (k) | Total Wt. loss (gm) | Medium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starch | 0.001297 | 0.0108 | Biotic |
| SUr | 0.00196 | 0.01527 | Biotic |
| SUr-Mn(II) | 0.001163 | 0.00906 | Biotic |