2020-06-12T23:52:30Zhttps:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/oai/oai.cgi
oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:23619902009-09-10brjcancerpmc-open
Br J Cancer British Journal of Cancer 0007-0920 1532-1827 Nature Publishing Group PMC2361990 PMC2361990 2361990 15812544 6602530 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602530 15812544 Molecular Diagnostics Investigation of systemic folate status, impact of alcohol intake and levels of DNA damage in mononuclear cells of breast cancer patients Hussien M M I 1 2 * McNulty H 3 Armstrong N 3 Johnston P G 4 Spence R A J 1 Barnett Y 3 5 Breast Surgery Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast, N Ireland BT9 7AB, UK Breast Surgery Unit, Level 3 west, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK School of Biomedical Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, N Ireland, UK Center for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, N Ireland, UK College of Science and Technology, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England, UK Author for correspondence: magedhussien@hotmail.com 05 04 2005 20 04 2005 25 04 2005 92 8 1524 1530 14 09 2004 09 02 2005 28 02 2005 Copyright 2005, Cancer Research UK 2005 Cancer Research UK

Folate is required for DNA synthesis, repair and methylation. Low folate status has been implicated in carcinogenesis, possibly as a result of higher rate of genetic damage. The aim of this study is to compare folate status and levels of DNA damage between breast cancer and benign breast disease control patients. Fasting blood samples from 64 histologically confirmed untreated breast cancer patients (mean age 57 years) and 30 benign breast disease control patients (mean age 51 years) were obtained. Red cell folate (RCF) and plasma homocysteine were measured. Mononuclear cells (MNC) were isolated for genetic damage analysis using the basic alkaline comet assay. Results are expressed as tail moment. Data were log transformed as appropriate before analysis for normalisation purposes. The geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of RCF (ng ml−1) in breast cancer patients was 339.07 (333.3–404.6) vs 379.5 (335.8–505.2) in control patients (P=0.24). Corresponding plasma homocysteine concentrations (μmol l−1) were 11.9 (10.6–16.4) vs 10.1 (9.3–11.9) (P=0.073), respectively. The mean tail moment (s.d.) of DNA damage in MNC of breast cancer patients detected by the basic comet assay was 1.4 (0.66) vs –0.17 (0.79) in controls (P<0.0001, t-test), the modified comet assay ‘endonuclease III (Endo III)' was 1.7 (0.70) vs 0.86 (0.81) (P<0.0001, t-test), and the modified comet assay ‘formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (FPG)' was 1.6 (0.62) vs 0.99 (0.94) (P<0.0001, t-test). There was a significant negative correlation between RCF levels and DNA damage detected by modified comet assay ‘FPG' (Pearson Correlation Coefficient r2=−0.26, P=0.02) and DNA damage was found to be significantly higher in MNC of breast cancer patients compared to benign breast disease control patients. Breast cancer patients tended to have lower RCF levels and higher levels of plasma homocysteine, but these differences were not significant. The study provides preliminary evidence that reduced folate status may be implicated in the aetiology of breast cancer perhaps by increasing the in vivo level of genetic instability.

 folate breast cancer DNA damage

Breast cancer remains one of the most common solid epithelial neoplasms. In the UK, there is an estimated annual incidence of 20 000 new cases per year, with a worldwide incidence of one million new cases per year (Sainsbury, 1999). Despite the fall in mortality in recent years, the incidence of breast cancer in the UK is rising (Sainsbury, 1999).

Collectively, the evidence from epidemiological, animal and human studies strongly suggests that folate status modulates the risk of developing cancers in selected tissue, the most notable of which is the colorectum (Kim, 1999). Folate depletion appears to enhance carcinogenesis, whereas folate supplementation may convey a protective effect (Kim, 1999). Recent studies suggest that folate may play an important role in the prevention of breast cancer, particularly among women consuming alcohol (Zhang, 2004). The means by which this modulation of cancer risk is mediated is not known with certainty, but there are several possible mechanisms (Zhang, 2004). Folate plays an integral role in DNA synthesis and methylation (Rampersaud et al, 2002). It is believed that folate deficiency affects DNA stability through two potential pathways. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate donates methyl group to uracil, converting it to thymine, which is used for DNA synthesis and repair. If folate is limited, imbalances in the DNA precursors occur, and uracil may be misincorporated into DNA. Subsequent misincorporation and repair may lead to double-strand breaks, chromosomal damage and cancer (Duthie et al, 2002). Folate affects gene expression by regulating cellular S-adenosylmethionine (SMA) levels. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate is the methyl donor in the remethylation process of homocysteine to methionine, which is converted to SAM. SAM methylates specific cytosines in DNA and thus regulates gene transcription. As a consequence of folate deficiency, cellular SAM is depleted, which in turn induces DNA hypomethylation and potentially induces proto-oncogene expression leading to cancer (Duthie et al, 2002).

Epidemiological evidence relating folate intake to breast cancer is limited. Some case–control studies reported an inverse association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk (Graham et al, 1991; Freudenheim et al, 1996; Levi et al, 2001). Graham et al (1991) reported 30% lower risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women who consume higher intake of dietary folate. In another case–control study, premenopausal women who consumed at least 460 μg day−1 of folate had a 50% lower risk of breast cancer than women who consumed 304 μg day−1 or less (Freudenheim et al, 1996). A Swiss case–control study also reported a significant inverse association between folate intake and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and this association was stronger in women who consumed alcohol (Levi et al, 2001). The population-based Shanghai Breast Cancer Study evaluated the association of dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk in China between 1996 and 1998 among 25–64 year old women, who never drank alcohol regularly or used vitamin supplement (Shrubsole et al, 2001). Dietary folate intake was significantly inversely associated with breast cancer risk in women who were in the highest (320 μg day−1) vs lowest (214 μg day−1) quartile of folate intake (Shrubsole et al, 2001). On the other hand, some case–control studies have failed to show any protective effect of folate against breast cancer (Thorand et al, 1998; Potischman et al, 1999; Negri et al, 2000). One recently published study reported that higher intakes of folate in early adult life does not reduce the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women (Cho et al, 2003).

Despite extensive investigation of the association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk, a concordance of opinion is not apparent (Kropp et al, 2001). Moreover, there is evidence from two large epidemiological studies that folate status may be a factor which affects the association between alcohol intake and breast cancer risk (Zhang et al, 1999; Rohan et al, 2000). In the meta-analysis conducted by Longnecker et al (1988), there was a strong evidence to support a dose–response relation between breast cancer risk and alcohol intake. A pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies conducted in Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden and the US, which included 322 ,647 women with 4335 cases of breast cancer diagnosed during the 11 years of follow-up period, reported results which were not clearly supportive that alcohol consumption is associated with breast cancer incidence (Smith-Warner et al, 1998).

Although there is some evidence to link lower folate to a higher risk of breast cancer, the evidence is not entirely consistent and most reported studies evaluated folate only on the basis of dietary intake data. The aim of this study was to compare the folate status measured by red cell folate (RCF) concentrations in breast cancer and control patients, and to relate this to levels of DNA damage in both groups.

PATIENT RECRUITMENT

Ethical approval for this cross-sectional study was granted by the Research Ethical Committee of Queen's University of Belfast. All patients gave written informed consent. Patients were recruited from the Breast Surgery Unit, Belfast City Hospital between August 2000 and August 2001. All patients undergoing surgery in the Breast Surgery Unit during the study period (300 breast cancer patients) were screened for potential inclusion in the study. The diagnosis of breast cancer and benign breast disease were histologically confirmed. Benign breast disease patients required surgery either at their own request or due to repeated episodes of inflammation around the nipple and areola (duct ectasia). A total of 64 pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer patients (cases) and 30 benign breast disease patients (controls) were recruited. All patients and controls were recruited within 3 weeks of the histological diagnosis. All patients were asked to complete a short questionnaire including past medical history, drug history and basic lifestyle questionnaire that included details about alcohol consumption and smoking.

The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer patients prior to any treatment and histologically confirmed pre- and postmenopausal benign breast disease patients.

Exclusion criteria were patients taking any vitamin supplements, or those with gastrointestinal disease (including inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption, coeliac disease) and patients with previous gastric or intestinal surgery. Patients taking medications known to interfere with folate metabolism, for example, antiepileptics, oral contraceptive pills and sulfasalazine, were also excluded. In addition, we excluded patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and patients with benign breast diseases that are known to increase the risk of breast cancer including ductal or lobualr epithelial hyperplasia.

 LABORATORY METHODS

A fasting blood sample (30 ml) was collected in the early morning before surgery for subsequent analysis of folate status (15 ml EDTA tube) and for isolation of mononuclear cells (MNC) (15 ml lithium heparin-coated tube) for DNA damage analysis. The patients then underwent surgery. A RCF lysate was prepared by diluting blood 1 : 10 with freshly prepared 1% ascorbic acid solution, wrapped in foil and mixed for 30 min, then stored at −80°C. Full blood picture analysis, including packed cell volume (required for the calculation of RCF concentration, that is, RCF=whole blood folate divided by packed cell volume) was measured in the remaining whole blood using an automated counter in Belfast City Hospital Trust Laboratories. All samples were stored at −80°C for batch analysis at the end of the study.

Mononuclear cells were separated within an hour of blood sample collection. The cell pellet was suspended in 1 ml the Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) (Gibco, UK) and the cells were counted using a haemocytometer or by automatic cell counter to ensure a concentration of 2–3 × 106 cells ml−1. Cell viability was checked using trypan blue (which stains dead cells a deep blue colour) to ensure viability of 80–90%. The cells were mixed with a freeze down medium (1.3 ml HBSS, 0.2 ml dimethyl sulphoxide and 0.56 ml autologous serum). This solution was transferred to −86°C freezer and subsequently into liquid nitrogen after 24 h for long-term storage.

The relationship between DNA damage markers and folate status was examined in both cases and controls by analysis of the blood samples for RCF levels using the microbiological assay (Molloy and Scott, 1997) and plasma homocysteine levels using the immunoassay (Leino, 1999). DNA damage biomarkers were measured in the MNC using the alkaline comet assay (Singh et al, 1988) and the modified comet assay (Collins et al, 1993) as described below.

Measurement of DNA damage: single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay

Levels of DNA damage (DNA single-strand breaks and alkali-labile lesions) in T-cell clones were determined using the alkaline comet assay, according to the method of Singh et al (1988), and also the modified alkaline comet assay described by Collins et al (1993).

In the modified comet assays, T cells embedded on slides were treated with either formamidopyrimidine glycosylase (FPG), which recognises oxidatively modified purines (Boiteux et al, 1992), or with endonuclease III (ENDO III), which recognises oxidatively modified pyrimidines (Asahara et al, 1989). These enzymes nick DNA at the sites of oxidatively damaged nucleotides, creating single-strand breaks which can be detected with the alkaline comet assay. T cells treated with 150 mM hydrogen peroxide for 5 min at 4°C (to induce oxidative DNA damage) were used as internal positive controls in the modified alkaline comet assay to verify enzyme activity.

The comet assays were performed at 4°C to minimise the repair of existing basal levels of DNA damage present in the T cells. Cells were embedded in a 1% agarose gel on frosted microscope slides (2 × 104 cells gel−1), and lysed for at least 1 h in a high salt alkaline buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 0.01 M Tris, 1%(v v−1) Triton X-100, pH 10). For the modified comet assay, slides were then equilibrated in enzyme buffer (0.04 M HEPES, 0.1 M KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg ml−1 BSA, pH 8.0) prior to application of FPG or ENDO III. Slides treated with the lesion-specific enzymes were incubated at 37°C in a humid dark chamber for 45 min. Following enzyme treatment (or directly after alkaline lysis in the case of the alkaline comet assay), the slides were placed in electrophoresis buffer (0.3 M NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 40 min. This period of incubation is to allow unwinding of DNA to be initiated from strand breaks, and then electrophoresis current is applied at 25 V, 300 mA, for 30 min. Following electrophoresis, the slides were neutralised using 0.4 M Tris pH 7.5 and stained with 50 μl of 20 μg ml−1 ethidium bromide. Stained slides were digitally analysed using UV microscopy and Komet 3.0 analysis software (Kinetic Imaging, UK), counting 50 cells per slide. DNA damage results were expressed as percentage DNA in the comet tail.

Internal controls

An established stable cell line was used as an internal control for all comet assays. The cells are lymphoblastoid human T-lymphocyte cells, RJK 853 clones (Yang et al, 1984; Beare et al, 1993). These internal control cells were used to demonstrate the reproducibility of the technique, and to calculate the coefficient of variation (CV) of each experiment (CV=standard deviation/mean).

 Statistics

All statistical analysis was performed using the statistics package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10 computer software package (Chersey, UK). For all statistical tests, P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Plasma homocysteine, RCF and DNA damage (tail moment) data were skewed and were log transformed to normalise the data for comparison (which was subsequently performed using the t-test). Correlation analysis was performed at the log scale using the Pearson Correlation.

 RESULTS

Although breast cancer and control patients were not singularly matched, their distribution was homogenous and no adjustment for anthropometric measurements, age or menopausal status was needed (Table 1). All patients had no high-risk family history of breast cancer. A total of 42 patients did not consume alcohol (26 cancer patients and 16 controls) (Table 1).

All patients recruited for the control group had histologically confirmed benign breast conditions. There were 13 fibroadenomata, nine benign inflammatory lesions, four breast reductions/nipple eversions, two lipomata and two sebaceous cysts of the breast. Patients with a fibroadenoma had a surgical excision due to their own request. Inflammatory lesions of the breast were all due to mammary duct ectasia. The postoperative histopathology of all surgically removed specimens confirmed benign breast disease with no evidence of cellular atypia or hyperplasia.

The mean value (95% confidence interval) of RCF of breast cancer patients was 369.0 (333.3–404.6) ng ml−1 compared to 420.5 (335.8–505.2) ng ml−1 for control patients. As the RCF values were skewed (positively skewed in control patients towards higher values, and negatively skewed in breast cancer patients towards lower values), all values were log transformed to normalise the data for comparison. Red cell folate levels for breast cancer patients and controls are shown in Table 2.

The mean value (95% confidence interval) of plasma homocysteine of breast cancer patients was 13.5 (10.6–16.4) μmol l−1 compared to 10.6 (9.3–11.9) μmol l−1 for control patients. The plasma homocysteine values were also skewed, and were log transformed to normalise the data for comparison. Results were presented as geometric mean (95% confidence interval of the geometric mean) and compared by using the t-test (Table 2). Although the results were not statistically significant, breast cancer patients tended to have lower RCF and higher plasma homocysteine levels than control patients.

DNA damage analysis

Following the basic alkaline comet assay, the mean (s.d.) tail moment for breast cancer patients was 5.0 (3.4) vs 1.1 (1.2) for control patients. The mean (s.d.) tail moment detected by the modified comet assay using Endonuclease III (which detects additionally oxidised pyrimidins) for breast cancer patients was 7.5 (6.2) vs 3.1 (2.3) for control patients. The mean (s.d.) tail moment detected by the modified comet assay using formamidopyrimidine glycosylase ‘FPG' (which detects additionally oxidised purines) for breast cancer patients was 6.3 (3.6) vs 3.7 (2.7) for control patients.

The tail moment values were highly positively skewed and for the purpose of normalisation, these were log transformed. The data were presented as log mean tail moment (Table 3).

Figure 1 shows the overall frequency distribution of DNA damage in the MNC in all slides analysed for breast cancer and control patients. It shows that 97% of MNC from control patients had tail moment values of 0–5, and 3% of the cells showed tail moment values of 5–10. On the other hand, mononuclear cells from breast cancer patients had a larger percentage of their cells in the higher tail moment categories, indicating more DNA damage (59% of these cells showed tail moment value of 0–5, 29% showed tail moment values of 5–10, 8% showed tail moment of 10–15 and 4% of the cells showed tail moment values of >15). A similar pattern was observed in samples processed by the modified comet assays, with a larger percentage of cells showing higher tail moment values in breast cancer than control patients.

Tail moment of RJK853 internal control cells was not skewed and was not log transformed. The mean (s.d.) tail moment of internal control cells detected by basic comet assay was 1.7 (1.2) and the coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.71. The mean (s.d.) tail moment of internal control cells detected by modified comet assay (Endonuclease III) was 3.5 (2.9) and the CV was 0.82, and for FPG enzyme was 4.8 (3.7) and the CV was 0.77. This shows that the CV was (0.71–0.82) and demonstrated that the technique is highly reproducible. It also proved good laboratory practice and evidence for the ability to compare breast cancer and control patients as the DNA damage induced by the technique of comet assay itself was minimal.

Correlation analysis

Correlation analysis was performed between plasma homocysteine or RCF status of all patients (including breast cancer and control patients) and DNA damage levels in MNC of all patients at the log scale (using Pearson Correlation).

There was a significant negative correlation between RCF values and DNA damage detected by the modified comet assay using FPG enzyme. There was no significant correlation between plasma homocysteine of all patients and DNA damage (Table 4).

 Impact of alcohol intake on DNA damage and folate status

Patients who consumed alcohol (total 52 patients, 38 breast cancer and 14 control patients) were divided into two groups according to their folate status. For the purpose of comparison, folate status was considered to be low if the RCF level was less than the median value (363.98 ng ml−1), and folate status high if the RCF was higher than the median value. Pearson Correlation was performed between log tail moment and log alcohol intake. In breast cancer patients who had low RCF values, there was a significant positive correlation between log alcohol intake and log tail moment detected by the modified comet assay (FPG) (Pearson Correlation Coefficient=0.58, P=0.04). In control patients who had low RCF values, there was no significant correlation between alcohol intake and DNA damage (Table 5).

In breast cancer patients who had high RCF values, there was a significant positive correlation between log alcohol intake and log tail moment detected by the modified comet assay (Endo III) (Pearson Correlation Coefficient=0.67, P=0.01) and log tail moment detected by the modified comet assay (FPG) (Pearson Correlation Coefficient=0.58, P=0.04). In control patients who had high RCF values, there was no significant correlation between alcohol intake and DNA damage (Table 5).

There was no significant correlation between log alcohol intake and log RCF in breast cancer patients (Pearson Correlation coefficient r2=0.05, P=0.73) or in control patients (Pearson Correlation Coefficient r2=−0.25, P=0.37).

 DISCUSSION

This study aimed to compare folate status and levels of DNA damage between breast cancer and benign breast disease (control) patients. Folate status was evaluated using RCF and plasma homocysteine, and DNA damage in the MNC was evaluated using the comet assay. Breast cancer patients tended to have a reduced folate status, that is, lower RCF and higher plasma homocysteine levels than control patients, but this failed to reach statistical significance. DNA damage in MNC of breast cancer patients was significantly higher than that of the control patients. Red cell folate was negatively correlated with DNA damage detected by the modified comet assay (using FPG enzyme). Alcohol intake was positively correlated (independent of folate status) with the level of DNA damage detected by the modified comet assay in breast cancer, but not the control patients. We were unable to demonstrate an interaction between folate status and alcohol intake in breast cancer or control patients.

The most frequently selected indicator of folate status is the erythrocyte folate level. Other indicators include serum and plasma folate levels (Jacques et al, 1993). The main limitation of serum and plasma folate levels is that they reflect transient changes in folate intake. The circulating folate concentration may be reduced in situations where there is no alteration in the overall status such as acute alcohol ingestion (Jacques et al, 1993). Folate is taken up only by the developing erythrocyte in the bone marrow, and therefore RCF is a good indicator of the long-term folate status (WU et al, 1975). Plasma homocysteine concentration increases when inadequate quantities of folate are available for the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine. Therefore, it is used as another indicator of folate status (Selhub et al, 1993). Although the current pilot study did not demonstrate a significant difference in RCF and plasma homocysteine concentrations, there is a possibility that a true difference might exist but was not demonstrated because of the small sample size in the study.

There is lack of data studying RCF and plasma homocysteine concentrations in breast cancer patients. One study investigated the incidence of breast cancer and the prediagnostic serum level of folate and homocysteine using serum specimens from the Washington County serum bank donated between 1974 and 1989 (Wu et al, 1999). Breast cancer cases (195 patients) were identified and were matched to 195 control subjects. There was no evidence for an association between serum folate or homocysteine levels and risk of breast cancer. There was no significant difference between the odds ratio of breast cancer for patients in the highest quartile of serum folate and that for patients in the lowest quartile. However, only nonfasting blood samples were available, which is known to affect the serum folate and homocysteine levels, and there are possible adverse effects of storage on the stored samples (Wu et al, 1999). A study recently reported by Beilby et al (2004) evaluated the folate status and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype of 141 breast cancer patients and 109 age-matched controls. The authors reported that serum folate was significantly lower in cancer patients and that the increased serum concentration of folate due to MTHFR polymorphism was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (Beilby et al, 2004). These two studies used serum folate, in contrast to our study which used RCF, as a marker of the folate status.

In the study being reported in this paper, the alkaline comet assay was used to investigate the level of DNA damage in MNC. This was significantly higher in breast cancer patients compared to the controls. We used the modified alkaline comet assay described by Collins et al (1993) to increase the sensitivity of the assay by additionally measuring the oxidised pyrimidine or purine bases. The Endo III and the FPG enzymes recognize oxidatively damaged pyrimidines and purines, respectively, and nick the DNA at these sites creating single-strand breaks, which can be detected by the comet assay, thus increasing the sensitivity of the assay (Collins et al, 1993). In this study, the levels of DNA damage detected by basic and modified comet assay were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than controls. We studied the effect of folate status on DNA damage by correlation analysis. The negative correlation was only significant for the DNA damage detected by FPG enzyme, which demonstrate the significance of increasing the sensitivity of the assay. The study conducted in vitro by Duthie et al (2002) reported that folate deficiency increased DNA damage in cultured human lymphocytes and the DNA instability was inversely related to the concentration of folic acid available to the cells, and also demonstrated the sensitivity of the modified comet assay. These findings, as well as our result may indicate that the intake of folate adequate for prevention of clinical deficiency may not be optimal for maintaining DNA stability.

Another study has investigated the level of DNA damage, using the basic comet assay, in leucocytes of 88 breast cancer patients and 121 healthy controls as well as in 188 first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients (Rajeswari et al, 2000). The authors reported that the maximum leucocyte DNA damage was observed in the breast cancer patients. The DNA damage in the leucocytes of the first-degree female relatives was 2.5 times higher compared to that of the healthy controls. The authors used the mean comet tail length (μm) as a measure of DNA damage, in contrast to this present study which used the mean tail moment (migrated DNA × tail length), so direct comparison of the results is not possible (Rajeswari et al, 2000). However, the previous study showed that the DNA damage was significantly higher in leucocytes from breast cancer patients compared to controls, which agrees with our findings.

In the current study, there was no significant association between alcohol intake and breast cancer risk, possibly because a large proportion of women did not consume alcohol, the relatively low-alcohol consumption and the relatively small number of patients in the study. Our results agree with several other studies which have reported lack of association of breast cancer with low-to-moderate alcohol consumption (Nasca et al, 1990; Howe et al, 1991; Sneyd et al, 1991; Longnecker et al, 1995; Swanson et al, 1997; Stoll, 1999; Rohan et al, 2000; Kropp et al, 2001). In the case–control study conducted by Kropp et al (2001) in Germany, which included 706 premenopausal breast cancer patients and 1381 controls, provided evidence that low-to-moderate level of alcohol consumption does not increase breast cancer risk. However, there was a significantly increased risk of breast cancer for alcohol intake of more than 31 g day−1.

Several investigators have examined the association between total folate intake and breast cancer risk by levels of alcohol consumption (Zhang et al, 1999; Rohan et al, 2000; Sellers et al, 2001). The Nurses Health Study demonstrated a significant positive association between alcohol intake and breast cancer risk, with a 24% increased risk among women consuming at least 15 g day−1 alcohol compared to nondrinkers (Zhang et al, 1999). Another cohort study from the Mayo Clinic, conducted by Sellers et al (2001) reported that women with low dietary folate (less than 186 μg day−1) and alcohol intake, more than 4 g day−1, had a 59% increased risk of breast cancer. The cohort study conducted by Rohan et al (2000) reported that in women who consumed more than 14 g day−1 of alcohol, women with low folate intake (less than 224 μg day−1) had a higher risk of breast cancer compared to women with high folate intake (more than 354 μg day−1). In the current study, patients who consumed alcohol were divided into low and high folate groups according to their RCF levels. There was a trend of a positive correlation between alcohol intake and DNA damage in breast cancer but not the control patients irrespective of their RCF status. This could be due to relatively low alcohol consumption and the small number of patients in this study.

In conclusion, DNA damage levels were found to be significantly higher in MNC of breast cancer patients compared to benign breast disease control patients. Breast cancer patients tended to have lower RCF and higher plasma homocysteine concentrations, but these differences were not statistically significant. There was evidence of a negative correlation between DNA damage and RCF in all patients. There was evidence of a positive correlation between DNA damage and alcohol intake in breast cancer, but not the control patients. However, this correlation was not affected by RCF status possibly as a result of the small numbers of patients in this study and relatively low alcohol consumption.

This is the first study to investigate the level of DNA damage and folate status in breast cancer and benign breast disease patients, providing some evidence that reduced folate may be implicated in the development of breast cancer.

We thank Dr Paul Hyland, University of Ulster, Coleraine for providing the comet assay training and the staff of the Molecular Biology Laboratory at the University of Ulster, Jordanstown for their help during the laboratory work of this project. Special thanks to Dr Anne Molloy and Dr Geraldine Mc Caffrey, Vitamin Research laboratory, St James's Hospital, Dublin for the analysis of blood samples.

 Asahara H Wisort PM Bank JF Bakerian RH Cunningham RP Purification and characterization of Escherichia coli endonuclease III from the cloned nth gene Biochemistry 1989 28 4444 4449 2669955 Beare DM Aldridge KE O'Donovan MR Cole J An improved procedure for the in vitro expansion of human T-lymphocyte clones for mutant analysis Mut Res 1993 291 207 212 7685061 Beilby J Ingram D Hahnel R Rossi E Reduced breast cancer risk with increasing serum folate in a case–control study of the C677T genotype of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene Eur J Cancer 2004 40 1250 1254 15110890 Boiteux S Gajewski E Laval J Dizdaroglu M Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli FPG protein (formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase): excision of purine lesions in DNA produced by ionising radiation or photosensitisation Biochemistry 1992 31 106 110 1731864 Cho E Spiegelman D Hunter DJ Chen WY Zhang SMl Premenopausal intakes of vitamin A, C and E, folate and carotenoids, and risk of breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Preven 2003 12 713 720 Collins AR Duthie SJ Dobson VL Direct enzymatic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA Carcinogenesis 1993 14 1733 1735 8403192 Duthie SJ Narayanan S Brand GM Pirie L Grant G Impact of folate deficiency on DNA stability J Nutr 2002 123 2444S 2449S Freudenheim JL Marshall JR Vena JE Laughlin R Graham S Postmenopausal breast cancer risk and intake of vegetables, fruits and related nutrients J Natl Cancer Inst 1996 88 340 348 8609642 Graham S Hellman R Marshal J Nutritional epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in Western New York Am J Epidemiol 1991 134 552 566 1951261 Howe G Rohan T Decarli A The association between alcohol and breast cancer risk: evidence from the combined analysis of six dietary case–control studies Int J Cancer 1991 47 707 710 2004852 Jacques PF Sulsky SI Sadowski JA Comparison of micronutrient intake measured by dietary questionnaire and biochemical indicators of micronutrient status Am J Clin Nutr 1993 57 182 189 8424386 Kim YI Folate and carcinogenesis: evidence, mechanisms and implications J Nutr Biochem 1999 10 66 88 15539274 Kropp S Becher H Nieters A Chang-Claude J Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk by age of 50 years among women in Germany Am J Epidemiol 2001 154 624 634 11581096 Leino A Fully automated measurement of total homocysteine in plasma and serum on the Abott IMX analyzer Clin Chem 1999 45 569 571 Levi F Pasche C Lucchini F La-Vecchia C Dietary intake of selected micronutrients and breast cancer risk Int J Cancer 2001 91 260 263 11146455 Longnecker MP Berlin JA Orza MJ Chalmers TC A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer JAMA 1988 260 652 656 3392790 Longnecker MP Paganini-Hill A Ross RK Lifetime alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in Los Angeles Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995 4 721 725 8672988 Molloy AM Scott JM Microbiological assay for serum plasma and red cell folate using cryopreserved, microtiter plate method Methods Enzymol 1997 281 43 53 9250965 Nasca PC Baptiste MS Field NA An epidemiological case–control study of breast cancer and alcohol consumption Int J Epidemiol 1990 19 532 538 2262245 Negri E La Vecchia C Franceschi S Dietary folate consumption and breast cancer risk J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 92 1270 1271 Potischman N Swanson CA Coates RJ Intake of food groups and associated micronutrients in relation to risk of early-stage breast cancer Int J Cancer 1999 82 315 321 10399945 Rajeswari N Ahuja YR Malini U Risk assessment in first degree female relatives of breast cancer patients using the alkaline comet assay Carcinogenesis 2000 21 557 561 10753185 Rampersaud GC Bailey LB Kauwell G Relationship of folate to colorectal and cervical cancer: review and recommendations for practitioners J Am Diet Assoc 2002 102 1273 1282 12792626 Rohan TE Jain M Howe GR Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: a cohort study Cancer Causes Control 2000 11 239 247 10782658 Rohan TE Jain MG Howe GR Miller AB Dietary folate consumption and breast cancer risk J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 92 266 269 10655445 SainsburyRTreatment of early stage breast cancer and breast reconstructionA Companion to Specialist Surgical Practice. Breast and Endocrine Surgery1999London: Harcourt Brace and Company Ltd243261Farndon JR (ed) pp Selhub J Jacques PF Wilson PWF Rush D Rosenberg IH Vitamin status and intake as primary determinants of homocysteinaemia in an elderly population JAMA 1993 270 2693 2698 8133587 Sellers JA Kushi LH Cerhan JR Vierkant RA Gapstur SM Vachon CM Olson JE Therneau TM Folsom AR Dietary folate intake, alcohol and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women Epidemiology 2001 12 420 428 11416780 Shrubsole MJ Jin F Shu X Dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk Cancer Res 2001 61 7136 7149 11585746 Singh NP McCoy T Tice RR Schneider EL A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells Exp Cell Res 1988 175 184 191 3345800 Smith-Warner SA Spiegelman D Yaun SS Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies JAMA 1998 279 535 540 9480365 Sneyd MJ Paul C Spears GF Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer Int J Cancer 1991 48 812 815 1860728 Stoll BA Alcohol intake and late-stage promotion of breast cancer Eur J Cancer 1999 35 1653 1658 10674009 Swanson CA Coates RJ Malone KE Alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk among women under the age of 45 years Epidemiology 1997 9 231 237 9583412 Thorand B Kohlmeier L Simonsen N Intake of fruits, vegetables, folic acid and related nutrients and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women Public Health Nutr 1998 1 147 156 10933412 Wu A Chanarin I Slavin G Levi AJ Folate deficiency in the alcoholic – its relationship to clinical and haematological abnormalities, liver disease and folate stores Br J Haematol 1975 29 469 478 1191558 Wu K Helzlsouer KJ Comstock GW Hoffman SC A prospective study on folate, B12, and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (B6) and breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999 8 209 217 10090298 Yang TP Patel PI Chinault AC Stout JT Jackson LG Hildebrand C Caskey CT Molecular evidence for new mutation at the hprt locus in Lesch–Nyhan patients Nature 1984 310 412 414 6087154 Zhang S Hunter DJ Hankinson SE A prospective study of folate intake and the risk of breast cancer JAMA 1999 281 1632 1637 10235158 Zhang SM Role of vitamins in the risk, prevention and treatment of breast cancer Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004 16 19 25 15128003

Frequency distribution of DNA damage in MNC of breast cancer and control patients. A greater percentage of the cells from the breast cancer patients had DNA damage levels in the highest damage categories of the frequency distributions. DNA damage expressed as tail moment=migrated DNA × tail length.

Characteristics of breast cancer and control patients

  Breast Cancer (s.d.) Control (s.d.) Significance (t-test)
Mean age (years) 57 (14.3) 51 (14.1) P=0.08
Weight (kg) 69.1 (12.8) 68.7 (11.6) P=0.86
Height (m) 1.60 (0.05) 1.59 (0.06) P=0.29
BMI (kg m−2) 26.6 (4.7) 27.1 (4.9) P=0.67
       
Menopausal status
 Premenopausal 21 14 P=0.26a
 Postmenopausal 43 16  
       
Alcohol consumption (g day−1) 3.49 (4.39) 4.69 (7.7) P=0.34
       
Smoking     P=0.82a
 Nonsmokers 55 27  
 Smokers 9 3  

χ2 test s.d.=standard deviation.

Blood folate status measurements in breast cancer and control patients

Variable Breast cancer geometric mean (95% CI) Controls geometric mean (95% CI) Significance (Student's t-test)
Red cell folate (ng ml−1) 339.07 (303.9–378.3) 379 (322.8–446.3) P=0.246
Plasma homocysteine (μmol l−1) 11.90 (10.61–13.25) 10.14 (9.01–11.43) P=0.073

Levels of DNA damage in mononuclear cells of breast cancer and control patients

Variable Breast cancer mean log TM (s.d.) [95% CI] Control mean log TM (s.d.) [95% CI] Significance (Student t-test)
1. Basic alkaline comet 1.46 (0.66) [1.26–1.66] −0.177 (0.79) [−0.43–0.08] P<0.0001*
2. Modified comet (Endo III) 1.77 (0.70) [1.56–1.98] 0.86 (0.81) [0.59–1.13] P<0.0001*
3. Modified comet (FPG) 1.67 (0.62) [1.46–1.88] 0.99 (0.94) [0.72–1.26] P<0.0001*

Significant (t-test). (s.d.)=standard deviation; 95% CI=95% confidence interval; TM=tail moment=migrated DNA × tail length; Endo III=endonuclease III enzyme (to detect oxidised pyrimidines); FPG=formamidopyrimidine glycosylase enzyme (to detect oxidised purines).

Correlation between folate status and levels and DNA damage in mononuclear cells of all patients

  Log mean tail moment
Variable Basic Comet Mean (s.d.) 0.82 (1.06) Endo III Mean (s.d.) 1.39 (0.85) FPG Mean (s.d.) 1.36 (0.82)
Red cell folate
Pearson Correlation (r2) −0.155 −0.157 −0.26*
(significance) (P=0.18) (P=0.18) (P=0.02)*
       
Plasma homocysteine
Pearson Correlation (r2) 0.08 0.06 0.08
(significance) (P=0.48) (P=0.58) (P=0.48)

Significant (Pearson Correlation). TM=tail moment=migrated DNA × tail length; Endo III=endonuclease III enzyme; FPG=formamidopyrimidine glycosylase enzyme.

Correlation between alcohol intake and DNA damage in mononuclear cells of breast cancer and control patients who had low and high red cell folate (RCF) values

  Log mean tail moment
  Basic Comet
Endo III
FPG
  Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.)
Log alcohol intake (g day−1) 0.82 (1.06) 1.39 (0.85) 1.36 (0.82)
Low red cell folate
 Breast cancer      
  Pearson Correlation (r2) 0.25 0.36 0.58
  (Significance) (P=0.42) (P=0.24) (P=0.04)*
       
 Controls
  Pearson Correlation (r2) −0.32 −0.17 −0.57
  (Significance) (P=0.42) (P=0.68) (P=0.13)
       
High RCF
 Breast cancer      
  Pearson Correlation (r2) 0.4 0.67 0.58
  (Significance) (P=0.19) (P=0.01)* (P=0.04)*
       
 Controls
  Pearson Correlation (r2) −0.007 −0.21 −0.75
  (Significance) (P=0.99) (P=0.72) (P=0.13)

Significant (Pearson Correlation). Low red cell folate (RCF)=less than median RCF value=363.98 ng ml−1. High red cell folate (RCF)=more than median RCF value=363.98 ng ml−1.