This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
The Cation Diffusion Facilitator (CDF) family is a ubiquitous family of heavy metal transporters. Much interest in this family has focused on implications for human health and bioremediation. In this work a broad phylogenetic study has been undertaken which, considered in the context of the functional characteristics of some fully characterised CDF transporters, has aimed at identifying molecular determinants of substrate selectivity and at suggesting metal specificity for newly identified CDF transporters.
Representative CDF members from all three kingdoms of life (Archaea, Eubacteria, Eukaryotes) were retrieved from genomic databases. Protein sequence alignment has allowed detection of a modified signature that can be used to identify new hypothetical CDF members. Phylogenetic reconstruction has classified the majority of CDF family members into three groups, each containing characterised members that share the same specificity towards the principally-transported metal, i.e. Zn, Fe/Zn or Mn. The metal selectivity of newly identified CDF transporters can be inferred by their position in one of these groups. The function of some conserved amino acids was assessed by site-directed mutagenesis in the poplar Zn2+ transporter PtdMTP1 and compared with similar experiments performed in prokaryotic members. An essential structural role can be assigned to a widely conserved glycine residue, while aspartate and histidine residues, highly conserved in putative transmembrane domains, might be involved in metal transport. The potential role of group-conserved amino acid residues in metal specificity is discussed.
In the present study phylogenetic and functional analyses have allowed the identification of three major substrate-specific CDF groups. The metal selectivity of newly identified CDF transporters can be inferred by their position in one of these groups. The modified signature sequence proposed in this work can be used to identify new hypothetical CDF members.
Copper, iron, zinc, cobalt, nickel and manganese are essential metal cations in cellular processes, since they act as important cofactors for many enzymes, are components of transcription factors and other proteins, and are essential for both mitochondrial and chloroplast functions. However, when present at high concentration, along with non-essential metals such as cadmium, mercury, silver and lead, essential metals can become extremely toxic, since they can cause oxidative damages or compete with other essential ions. A network of uptake, extrusion, chelation, trafficking and storage mechanisms ensures the maintenance of metal homeostasis at the cellular level. Specific transporters, encoded by multigenic families, are responsible for the uptake and secretion of metal ions, and for their sequestration into organelles [
Cation diffusion facilitator (CDF, TC 2.A.4) transporters, first identified by Nies and Silver [
Most CDF family transporters also contain a histidine-rich region, either between TMDs IV and V, or at the N and/or C termini. Such regions are predicted to be cytoplasmic, cis to metal uptake, and could function as potential metal (Zn2+, Co2+, and/or Cd2+) binding domains. However the ER-localised Zrg17, a Zn2+ transporter recently characterised in yeast, displays a histidine-rich loop predicted to reside between TMDs III and IV toward the ER lumen [
Some CDF transporters function as homo-oligomeric complexes [
Research over the past few years, mainly performed on prokaryotic CDF members, has aimed at identifying molecular mechanisms involved in metal binding and transport across the membranes. Key functional amino acid residues, identified by site-directed mutagenesis, reside in the three amphipathic and conserved transmembrane helices II, V and VI, which are supposed to constitute an inner core forming a channel [
Here we undertake a phylogenetic analysis of CDF family amino acid sequences based on a set of CDF sequences retrieved from databases. Based on a multiple sequence alignment, we propose a modified signature for the CDF family that takes account of newly characterised members. Coupled with the substrate specificities of some characterised transporters, we are able to classify the family members into three major groups that have different selectivity towards the principally-transported metal (Zn-, Fe/Zn- and Mn-CDF). Functional analyses, based on site-directed mutagenesis, were carried out on the eukaryotic Zn2+ transporter PtdMTP1 [
Deduced amino acid sequences, belonging to characterised or hypothetical CDF transporters, have been retrieved from Genebank and SwissProt and from a set of annotated genomes, thus covering most phylogenetic groups (see Methods). An additional set of sequences, homologous to Zrg17 from
Sequences that displayed significant truncation were discarded. A final set of 273 representative CDF amino acid sequences (see accession numbers in additional file
S-X-[ASG]-[LIVMT]2-[SAT]-[DA]-[SGAL]-[LIVFYA]-[HDN]-X3-D-X2-[AS]
X = any amino acid
[ ] = one of the amino acid between brackets is possible
Since 1997, new CDF transporters have been characterised or identified by similarity with known CDFs, and the number of recognised CDF family members has dramatically expanded, in large part due to data coming from automated annotated genomic sequences; the first signature was derived from only 13 CDF members and now appears too restrictive to allow the recognition of the newly identified CDF members. From the original signature, an improved signature was designed based on the amino acid multiple sequence alignment. Compared to the original signature, this pattern is extended on the C terminus side and includes a fully conserved glycine (underlined below) and the downstream five amino acids. The lack of the conserved glycine and the downstream amino acids in the signature pattern allows a false match with non-CDF proteins otherwise absent when using the complete modified signature. The pattern was subsequently checked against Swiss-Prot (release 50.2), TrEMBL (release 33.2) and PDB databases at ScanProsite [
X = any amino acid
[ ] = one of the amino acid between brackets is possible
{ } = any amino acid except those between braces
When scanned against the three available databases, the original signature [
The tentative signature thus covers the second transmembrane helix, the start of the third TMD and the cytosolic loop connecting the two TMDs (Figure
To delineate the importance of highly conserved residues, single amino acid substitutions were generated by site directed mutagenesis, on a well-characterised eukaryotic CDF, namely the vacuolar Zn2+ transporter PtdMTP1 from the hybrid poplar
As suggested by topological predictions from diverse CDF family members, the highly conserved glycine residue resides in the cytoplasm close to the beginning of TMDIII. The G118A substitution led to a drastic decrease of function, as shown by a complementation test in the Zn-hypersensitive mutant
To check the localisation of the mutant protein, a GFP fused version was expressed in
From the sequence alignment, other amino acids were widely conserved, in particular charged and other polar residues in the amphipathic TMDs II, V and VI. These residues correspond, in PtdMTP1, to the aspartate residues located on TMDs II, V and VI (D86, D93, D264 and D288) and the histidine residues located on TMDs II and V (H89 and H260). The residues are likely to be involved in cation transport and/or binding; indeed when changed they affected the function of bacterial CDF members ([
Phylogenetic analysis using Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was carried out on the 273-protein alignment, resulting in the tree shown in Figure
The first group included phyla specific members, such as the Zrc1-like, DmeF-like, ZitB-like, the ZnT1-like, and ZnT6-like clusters. The Zrc1-like cluster comprised only fungal CDFs originating from Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, and Zygomycetes. The bacterial specific DmeF-like and ZitB-like clusters included DmeF from
Several CDF transporters belonging to Group I have been biochemically characterised; metal specificities have been mainly investigated by heterologous complementation, and also inferred from the phenotypes shown by gene-specific mutants, or over-expression of the transporter. Few transporters have been studied in reconstituted proteoliposomes or in everted membrane vesicles (Figure
This group includes the bacterial FieF-like and WmFieF-like clusters and the fungal MMT-like cluster (Figure
This group comprises MTP8-like sequences (bootstrap value = 91), including the well characterised ShMTP1 and its paralogs ShMTP2, ShMTP3, and ShMTP4 from
Additionally, the human ZnT9 protein clustered with plant, algal and bacterial CDF members in the ZnT9-like cluster, and this was thus the only mixed prokaryotic-eukaryotic CDF cluster (Figure
We further searched for residues that could represent candidate sites of functional divergence of the CDF groups. Remarkably, Mn-CDF sequences could be differentiated by the consensus sequence DxxxD (x = any amino acid) in TMD V, which appears as HxxxD in all other CDF sequences from the Zn- and Fe/Zn-CDFs, D being the highly conserved aspartate residue important for CDF function ([
In TMD II a histidine (Zn-CDF)/aspartate (Mn-CDF) residue is conserved within each specific group, although in the Fe/Zn-CDF group, both aspartate (FieF-like cluster) and histidine (MMT-like and WmFieF-like clusters) are present (Figure
Another key structural feature is the presence of a histidine-rich region in most CDFs, except the Mn-CDF, the ZnT9-like, FieF-like, and WmFieF-like transporters (Figure
Mn-CDF members present a serine-rich region at the N terminal. Sequences belonging to Zrg17-like and MMT-like clusters also have a histidine/serine-rich loop, although located between TMDs III and IV (Figure
A specific feature of the Zn-CDFs is the presence of few cysteine residues conserved within some clusters: sulfhydryl moieties are known to have a role in metal binding (mostly Zn2+ and Cd2+). In the ZnT1-like cluster five cysteine residues are conserved at the cytosolic C terminus; another cysteine residue is conserved in TMD III in both ZnT1-like and Zrc1-like clusters; the Msc2-like cluster shows a cysteine residue conserved in all sequences at TMD III (by referring to the CDF domain). Other cysteine residues are conserved in the ZnT2-like cluster: in order to test the importance of these cysteine residues for function and their conservation during evolution, all five cysteine residues (C30, C35, C64, C291, and C357) were changed to serine in the poplar PtdMTP1 member. C30, C64, and C291 were conserved within the ZnT2-like cluster, and C35 and C357 were conserved only in the plant members of this cluster. Substitution of the C35 residue abolished the function of the transporter, while the C30S and C64S substitutions only partially affected PtdMTP1 function (Figure
In the present work, we propose a modified signature that better takes into account the newly characterised CDF transporters. Retrieved at Prosite [
CDF member distribution in the phylogenetic tree was not related to organism taxonomy, but rather to substrate specificity suggesting ancient duplication events followed by subfunctionalization (metal specialization) in a common ancestor to prokaryotes and eukaryotes. More recent duplications or gene losses could have arisen in several taxa and lineages leading to a complex distribution pattern of CDF isoforms (orthologous and paralogous copies) in living organisms. Based on amino acid sequence similarities and phylogeny of a set of 273 CDF sequences, and on biochemical features of some well-characterised CDF members, the CDF family could be divided into three major groups, one containing Zn-CDF transporters (ZnT2-like, ZnT1-like, ZnT6-like, Zrc1-like, Msc2-like, ZitB-like, and DmeF-like clusters), another enclosing Fe/Zn-CDF transporters (MMT-like, FieF-like, and WmFieF-like clusters) and a third containing only Mn-CDF transporters (MTP8-like sequences) (Figure
An update of CDF classification is therefore suggested in order to take into better account phylogenetic and functional features. Three groups are proposed: Zn-CDF, Fe/Zn-CDF and Mn-CDF. Ten of the 11 clusters belonging to these groups were already classified in CDF subfamilies by Nies [
The Mn-, the Zn- and Fe/Zn-CDF groups share many conserved residues, suggesting that they derived from a common ancestor. Newly identified CDF members can be assigned to one of these groups and therefore their substrate specificity can be inferred: for example in plants, only members belonging to the Zn-CDF [
The number of transmembrane domains predicted in each transporter is roughly conserved in each cluster, most including from 4 to 6 TMDs, depending on the method used for the prediction. Notably, the Msc2-like cluster included all members with a relatively high TMD number (12 TMDs in Msc2, HsZTL1, and AtMTP12, to 15 TMDs in HsZnT5).
Subcellular localisation of CDF transporters is not always conserved within clusters. The Fe/Zn-CDF group mainly contained sequences from prokaryotes (Archaea or Eubacteria) and fungi. The mitochondrial localisation of ScMMT1 and ScMMT2 [
The relatively high number of Zn-CDFs found in databases compared with the number of Mn-CDFs may reflect the evolutionary pressure to which the organisms were subjected. Indeed some Zn-CDFs display a broad specificity, which gives a potentially useful trait to the organism. The only CDF transporter known to transport Ni2+ (over Zn2+) is present in the Ni-hyperaccumulator species
In the present study we identified residues that are crucial for function in the model eukaryotic Zn-CDF PtdMTP1. Amino acid substitutions of conserved aspartate and histidine residues in TMDs II and V led to the loss of almost any detectable function in complementation tests. In EcFieF four amino acids belonging to TMD II (D45 and D49) and to TMD V (H153 and D159) are the metal coordination residues that directly interact with the substrate during binding and transport [
Concerning PtdMTP1, all the mutant proteins were expressed and localised using GFP to the tonoplast, as found for the wild type protein [
The identification of molecular determinants that may reflect metal specificity is an interesting research field with application to bioremediation. Several features may contribute to metal specificity in CDF members, nevertheless the widely conserved aspartate residues in TMDs II and V cannot alone be responsible for metal specificity, because they are conserved in transporters with different metal specificities. The mechanism of metal selectivity might be guaranteed by the coordination chemistry in the chemical context of the immediate binding site neighbourhood. Zn2+ usually favours a tetrahedral coordination geometry. Mn2+ and Fe2+ are mainly found in octahedral coordination even though a tetrahedral coordination geometry of ligands is also favoured by these metals. The amino acids located in TMD V, four residues upstream from the highly conserved aspartate, seemed to be candidates of choice for determination of metal specificity of the Zn- and Fe/Zn-CDFs (histidine) or of the Mn-CDFs (aspartate). At least four features suggested that these residues are likely to be important in the determination of substrate specificity: (i) they were not interchangeable, at least in the eukaryotic Zn2+ transporter PtdMTP1 (Figure
The other conserved and amphipathic helices did not contain any completely group-conserved residue that may be related to metal specificity. Nevertheless this does not exclude their involvement in conferring metal specificity. Even if we cannot conclude that the presence of this distinctive amino acid (D or H) may be sufficient to discriminate the substrate, this could be a starting point for further investigations. Other mechanisms, such as the interactions with metal chelating proteins or cofactors and the involvement of histidine rich regions (Figure
In the present study phylogenetic and functional analyses have allowed the identification of three major substrate-specific CDF groups: Zn-, Fe/Zn-, and Mn-CDF. A modified signature that better fits with the increased number of hypothetical CDF transporters is described and might be useful to identify new CDF transporters. The metal specificity of newly identified CDF transporters can be then deduced by their classification into one of these three groups, but only an exhaustive functional characterization of CDF members will allow us to confirm this hypothesis. In particular the role of the group-conserved aspartate/histidine residue in metal selectivity has to be verified by complementation tests in other metal-specific sensitive strains. Moreover site directed mutagenesis analyses on other regions potentially involved in substrate specificity and in transporters belonging to the different CDF groups will be useful in finding the molecular determinants of metal selectivity of the CDF family.
Deduced amino acid sequences, belonging to characterised or hypothetical CDF transporters, have been retrieved from Genebank and SwissProt and from a set of annotated genomes. These include the Archaea
Logo representation of the CDF signature was constructed with the web interface program WebLogo [
The yeast strains used for the heterologous expression of
Mutant
TMD, Transmembrane domain; CDF, Cation Diffusion Facilitator; GFP, Green Florescence Protein; MTP, Metal Tolerance Protein; ZnT, Zinc Transporter; SLC30, Solute carrier family 30.
BM carried out the phylogenetic analysis, participated to the site-directed mutagenesis studies and drafted the manuscript, DB participated in the site-directed mutagenesis studies and in the design of the study, SJ helped in the conception and interpretation of the phylogenetic analysis, DS and MC participated in the design of the study, and revised the manuscript critically. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
The protein ID of the CDF amino acid sequences used for phylogenetic analysis is reported, with the taxonomy classification, accession numbers, and the related database. For sequences retrieved from genome sequencing projects the corresponding database source is reported.
Click here for file
Dr B. Montanini was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the "Ministère délégué à l'Enseignement supérieur et à la Recherche". We thank Dr R. Percudani (Univ. Parma, Italy) for helpful discussions. Financial support from the IFR 110 (Génomique, Ecophysiologie et Ecologie fonctionnelles), from the ANR (PHYTOPOP project, PRECODD program) and from the EU Framework Programme 6 ("PHIME") is gratefully acknowledged.
Mutagenesis studies on CDF members
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||||
| Topological position | AA substitution | Phenotype | AA substitution | Phenotype | AA substitution | Phenotype | AA substitution | Phenotype |
|
|
||||||||
| N ter | C30S | Partially activee | ||||||
| N ter | C35S | No functione | ||||||
| N ter | C64S | Partially activee | ||||||
| N ter | H5R | Partially activea | ||||||
| N ter | H7R | No functiona | ||||||
| N ter | H9R | Partially activea | ||||||
| TMD I | E31D | Partially activea | E35D | Partially activeb | ||||
| TMD I | E35A | Partially activeb | ||||||
| TMD I | E31K | No functiona | ||||||
| TMD II | D50E | Partially activea | ||||||
| TMD II | D50A | No functiona | D86A | No functionf | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| TMD II | M5OL | Hypersensitivea | M54L | Partially activea | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TMD II | D53N | Hypersensitivea | ||||||
| TMDs II-III loop | G118A | No functione | ||||||
| TMD IV | N135A | No functiona | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TMD V | S167A | No functiona | ||||||
| W182L | Partially activea | |||||||
| TMD VI | D181A | Partially activea | D186A | No functiona | D288A | No functione | ||
| TMD VI | D181E | Hypersensitivea | D186E | Partially activea | D288E | No functione | ||
| TMD VI | D181N | Hypersensitivea | ||||||
| C ter | C291S | Wild typee | ||||||
| C ter | E214A | No functiona | ||||||
| C ter | H237R | No functiona | ||||||
| C ter | H251A | Partially activea | ||||||
| C ter | W245L | Partially activea | ||||||
| C ter | G248T | Partially activeb | ||||||
| C ter | C357S | Wild typee | ||||||
| C ter | H280A | No functiona | ||||||
| C ter | H298A | No functiona | ||||||
| C ter | C290S | Hypersensitivea | C294S | Wild typea | ||||
The results of site-directed mutagenesis analyses carried out on four CDF transporters ([14, 23, 29-31] and present study) are reported with the corresponding topological position. RmCzcD: Zn-CDF from
Oligonucleotides used for the introduction of amino acid substitutions in PtdMTP1
| Primer name | Position | Sequence | Substitution |
| C30Sf | 72-102 | TGGAGGAAGCAAGGGAaGCGGGGAAGCACCT | C30S |
| C30Sr | 102-72 | AGGTGCTTCCCCGCtTCCCTTGCTTCCTCCA | C30S |
| C35Sf | 87-118 | TGCGGGGAAGCACCTTgTGGATTTTCAGAT | C35S |
| C35Sr | 118-87 | ATCTGAAAATCCAcAAGGTGCTTCCCCGCA | C35S |
| C64Sf | 175-205 | ATATCCGTGGCACTTTcTATAGTCTTCATG | C64S |
| C64Sr | 205-175 | CATGAAGACTATAgAAAGTGCCACGGATAT | C64S |
| G118Af | 343-372 | CAATCTTATGcATTTTTTAGGATTGAGATT | G118A |
| G118Ar | 372-343 | AATCTCAATCCTAAAAAATgCATAAGATTG | G118A |
| H260Df | 764-793 | AAGGAGCTTATCTCgATGTACTTGGGGATT | H260D |
| H260Dr | 793-764 | AATCCCCAAGTACATcGAGATAAGCTCCTT | H260D |
| D264Ef | 775-804 | CTCCATGTACTTGGGGAaTCCATCCAGAGT | D264E |
| D264Er | 804-775 | ACTCTGGATGGAtTCCCCAAGTACATGGAG | D264E |
| D264Af | 775-804 | CTCCATGTACTTGGGGcTTCCATCCAGAGT | D264A |
| D264Ar | 804-775 | ACTCTGGATGGAAgCCCCAAGTACATGGAG | D264A |
| D288Ef | 847-876 | GAGTGGAAGATAATTGAaCTGATCTGCACC | D288Ef |
| D288Er | 876-847 | GGTGCAGATCAGtTCAATTATCTTCCACTC | D288Ef |
| D288Af | 847-876 | GAGTGGAAGATAATTGcTCTGATCTGCACC | D288A |
| D288Ar | 876-847 | GGTGCAGATCAGAgCAATTATCTTCCACTC | D288A |
| C291Sf | 855-885 | ATAATTGATCTGATCTcCACCCTAATCTTT | C291S |
| C291Sr | 885-855 | AAAGATTAGGGTGgAGATCAGATCAATTAT | C291S |
| C357Sf | 1053-1083 | AAGATTCTCTTGGCTTcTCATGTGAAAATC | C357S |
| C357Sr | 1083-1053 | GATTTTCACATGAgAAGCCAAGAGAATCTT | C357S |
For each oligonucleotide the position on the