Present address: Didier Schaefer, Station de Génétique et d'Amélioration des Plantes, INRA, Route de St Cyr, 78026 Versailles, France
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact
MSH2 is a central component of the mismatch repair pathway that targets mismatches arising during DNA replication, homologous recombination (HR) and in response to genotoxic stresses. Here, we describe the function of MSH2 in the moss
The mismatch repair (MMR) system is evolutionarily highly conserved and plays an essential role in maintaining genome stability (
The methyl-directed MMR system of
The
However, in plants, the effect of MSH2 mutations is still poorly understood. In
The moss
The Gransden wild-type strain of
We used standard methods for all molecular cloning (
To obtain PpAPT-KO, a 3995 bp Xba1 and EcoRI fragment covering the
Protoplasts were isolated from 6-day-old protonema by incubation for 40 min in 1% Driselase (Fluka 44585) dissolved in 0.47 M mannitol. The suspension was filtered successively through 80 and 40 µm stainless steel sieves. Protoplasts were sedimented by low-speed centrifugation (600
Moss protoplasts (1.2 × 106) were transformed as described previously (
Moss DNA was extracted from 200 mg of fresh protonema tissue ground in 220 µl of extraction buffer (220 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA and 0.5% SDS) with an electric pestle in the presence of sand. After centrifugation, DNA was precipitated with isopropanol at room temperature. The pellet was dried and resuspended with 100 µl sterile water. Stable disruptants of the
Moss RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen) starting with 100 mg of fresh protonema. We obtained doubled-stranded cDNAs corresponding to mRNAs expressed in 6-day-old protonema cultures using the SMART-PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech). The primers PpMSH2#4 and PpMSH2#2 (CACCAACACGCGCAAAGATG) were used for PCR on these cDNAs.
Direct repeats of LoxP recombination sites from the Cre/lox system (
Binocular observations were made with a Nikon SMZ1000, and microscopic observations with a Leitz (type 090-122.012) inverted microscope.
Mutations in the
Cisplatin (
Wild-type and
Protoplasts in liquid mannitol medium were exposed to ionizing radiation (1 Gy/s) using a 137Cs irradiator (IBL-637 CIS-Bio-International, Institut Curie, Orsay). After 20 h in the dark, the protoplasts were spread on solid medium at low concentrations.
Protoplasts spread on solid medium (5 × 104 protoplasts at each concentration in four Petri dishes) were exposed to UV-B light (60 J/m2/s) from a 312 nm TFX lamp. We calculated the flux with a UV-Elektronik GmbH dosimeter. The protoplasts were then left in the dark for 20 h.
After 6 days regeneration, protoplasts were transferred onto standard solid medium. After 1 week, the number of survivors was counted. We repeated these experiments two to three times. Statistical analyses have been made with the χ2 test.
Targeting
Moss protoplasts were transformed with vector PpMSH2-KO and four independent clones were selected for further investigation (
The haploid gametophytic development of
Preliminary observations of
Differentiation of chloronema cells into caulonema cells looks normal in the mutant compared with wild type. After 10 days of growth, differentiation of buds and further development of leafy shoots could clearly be observed in WT colonies whereas, at the same time-point, the
The late developmental stages of
In order to check the phenotype of late growing colonies, we inoculated similar size filaments (5–10 cells) from 3-week-old single protoplasts derived colonies on standard medium. After 6 weeks, the mutant colonies started to become chlorotic and a significant fraction of the cells were dead (data not shown). After 12 weeks, wild-type colonies were healthy (
The strong developmental defects observed in
We observed no resistant colonies in the wild type and a total of 398 2-FA resistant colonies in the
MMR is known to recognize different types of DNA damages depending on the lesion and on the organism. MMR is responsible for the hypersensitivity to agents, such as radiation or some genotoxic chemicals that create DNA lesions (
Ionizing radiation can cause many different lesions in DNA, including strand breaks and base or sugar damage (
A high UV-B flux can introduce a number of different lesions into the genome, mostly cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine-6-4-pyrimidinone adducts (6-4PPs) (
Cisplatin is a DNA-damaging drug that forms bifunctional covalent adducts with DNA and is a well-recognized mutagen that affects the survival of mammalian cells (
The cytotoxicity of methylating agents such as MNU (
In
We observed a significant decrease (1.8-fold) in GT frequency for mutant cells compared to wild type (
The sensitivity of cells to agents that create lesions on DNA has been attributed to attempts of MMR to correct the resulting damage (
In
Peters
Experiments in
The fact that
We examined the influence of MMR on HR in
We tested the influence of MMR on homeologous recombination in
In conclusion, we have found that in moss, MSH2 is involved in mismatch recognition and repair that most likely results from DNA replication errors, and in the response to certain genotoxic agents. Moreover, MSH2 plays a role in HR and in the recognition of mismatches that occur during heteroduplex formation between two not perfectly complementary DNA strands. These mechanisms are essential for maintaining genome integrity in all organisms and to establish interspecific barrier. This is particularly true for plants as they are unable to move and must cope with exposure to environmental mutagens. Thus, an efficient mechanism for genomic stability is needed in plants, and even more in mosses, where the major developmental stage of the life cycle is the haploid gametophyte. This is emphasized by the dramatic deleterious effect on development observed in an
The authors thank Mr Favodon, (Institut Curie, Orsay, France), for help with the 137Cs irradiator for gamma radiations assays. The authors thank Dr Michel Laloue (INRA Versailles, France) for providing the 2-Fluoroadenine. The authors thank Marie-Pascale Doutriaux, Mathilde Grelon, Christine Mézard and Raphaël Mercier for suggestions and discussions on the manuscript. This work was supported by grant from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique and Cellectis SA (Romainville, France). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
Molecular analysis of
Comparison of wild type and
Survival fraction after different genotoxic stresses. (
Gene targeting PpAPT fragments used for homologous and homeologous recombination studies. The hygromycin gene resistance cassette is represented between both PpAPT fragments by a horizontal interrupted line. (
Point mutations identified in the
| Genomic position |
Amino acid |
DNA mutation | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1447 | 28 | GGC→TGC | Intron I splicing |
| 1462 | 33 | GAT→TAT | D→T |
| 1559 | 65 | GGT→GAT | G→D |
| 1687 | Intron II | AGG→ATG | Intron II splicing |
| 2121 | 108 | GGT→GAT | G→D |
| 2195 | 133 | GCC→ACC | A→T |
| 2464 | 150 | GCG→GAG | A→E |
| 2485 | 157 | TGC→TAC | C→Y |
aPosition 1 corresponds to the first nucleotide in the genomic
bPosition 1 corresponds to the ATG codon in the PpAPT protein.
cUniversal genetic code for amino acid.
Gene targeting frequency in wild type and
| Genotypes | ||
|---|---|---|
| Divergence (%) | Wild type | Ppmsh2Δ |
| 0 | 44% (90/204) |
24% (68/278) |
| 1 | 14% (11/81) |
31% (14/45) |
| 2 | 9% (4/46) |
20% (4/20) |
| 3 | 2% (2/124) |
30% (29/96) |
aPercentages correspond to GT frequency, which is the number of 2-FA resistant clones divided by the number of stables hygromycin resistant clones, indicated in brackets.